Yaco would like to contribute (aka improving REST interface)

[erny18031]

Hi.

Yaco developers (msaelices, antoniomaria/asanchez, erny1803/Ernesto Revilla) would like to contribute:

* ACT-947: Retrieve process variables through REST interface
* ACT-946: Category in ProcessDefinition REST Response
* ACT-945: Enable creating new users through rest interface
* ACT-959: Retrieve process diagram through rest interface by processDefinitionId
* ACT-960: Retrieve active task list from processInstanceId
All issues have patches attached.

Beside this we have already the following for REST API, but JIRA issues are still not created:
* Create Tasks and substasks
* Return processDefinitionId for each task
* Get process definition & tasks
* Reassign tasks
* Save variables in history patch

Beside this, we may like to contribute authentication with proxy user, much like Alfresco or the usual master user in IMAP.

Best regards.
Erny

[trademak]

Hi,

Great, I think we should be able to get your accounts ready for next week or so.
Keep you posted.

Best regards,

[erny18031]

Hi.

Finally we have svn account (although I still didn't test commits) and our Alfresco collaboration agreements are already processed and accepted by Alfresco.

Should we create a branch (e.g. yaco) or would it be better to fork elsewhere, like on github (e.g.: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/796991/fork-and-synchronise-google-code-subversion-repository-int... )

Regards
Erny

Hi,

Great, I think we should be able to get your accounts ready for next week or so.
Keep you posted.

Best regards,

[jbarrez]

A branch or patch linked to the jira issue is the preffered way.

[erny18031]

All issues have already patches attached.

[javaduke]

Thanks for fixing ACT-947, that's exactly what I've been looking for! Now if only the same could be done for historic details…
I actually just posted a question here: http://forums.activiti.org/en/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=3449 - could this be done via REST?

[erny18031]

Well, we made a patch previous to the one of trademak by creating another REST resource. But trademak seems to implement this on 2011-12-02 as part of ProcessInstanceResource. I don't know if the documentation is up to date.

Regards.
Erny