Where is *the real* alfresco-src-1.3.zip ?

Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎07-25-2006 09:35 AM
It was there for every release ( ie. alfresco-src-1.2.1.zip). As there's no method to get it from svn, would you please just put it there? This is just throwing stones in the path of a contributor…
regards,
Tom
regards,
Tom
Labels:
- Labels:
-
Archive
6 REPLIES 6
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎07-25-2006 11:03 AM
I am not sure if you are looking for this. Try it.
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/alfresco/alfresco-src-1.3.0dev.zip?download
—————-
-Manmeet
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/alfresco/alfresco-src-1.3.0dev.zip?download
—————-
-Manmeet

Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎07-25-2006 11:29 AM
As far as i understand this zip contains the sources of:
Alfresco 1.3 Community Preview from (2006-05-13 11:50)
The 1.3 release is:
Alfresco 1.3.0 from (2006-06-26 19:20)
Thats what sourceforge says. So we have a release 1.3 of open source alfresco without real sources. Thats's because they killed the old cat (=pre 1.3 repository) and the new one doesn't know anything about the release 1.3 (see other posts in this forum). Why this gap? Someone with alfresco should have the source - or was it virgin birth?
weird
Tom
Alfresco 1.3 Community Preview from (2006-05-13 11:50)
The 1.3 release is:
Alfresco 1.3.0 from (2006-06-26 19:20)
Thats what sourceforge says. So we have a release 1.3 of open source alfresco without real sources. Thats's because they killed the old cat (=pre 1.3 repository) and the new one doesn't know anything about the release 1.3 (see other posts in this forum). Why this gap? Someone with alfresco should have the source - or was it virgin birth?
weird
Tom

Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎07-25-2006 01:07 PM
Hi
Not wierd 🙂
There's the SDK bundle and SVN access. It got to the point where managing loads of different bundles was becoming a pain. People were taking the src and trying to use it like an SDK and complaining - so we decided that making an SDK bundle with samples and examples was important. People also kept fussing for SVN access, so we created a public mirror.
We had some issues with the mirroring, so I need to check what is actually available. If 1.3 isn't recoverable easily via SVN, then I'll get a src bundle made up and put on SourceForge this time.
Cheers
Paul.
Not wierd 🙂
There's the SDK bundle and SVN access. It got to the point where managing loads of different bundles was becoming a pain. People were taking the src and trying to use it like an SDK and complaining - so we decided that making an SDK bundle with samples and examples was important. People also kept fussing for SVN access, so we created a public mirror.
We had some issues with the mirroring, so I need to check what is actually available. If 1.3 isn't recoverable easily via SVN, then I'll get a src bundle made up and put on SourceForge this time.
Cheers
Paul.

Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎07-26-2006 04:38 AM
Hello Paul,
i saw that you put the source of core, repository etc as archives in the SDK. So the source seems to be there! What lacks are the (importable) eclipse projects, and i am not sure if or how they can be reconstructed..
What about putting the eclipse projects in the SDK too? Then we could use the availabe jars or change them, just as needed (and you don't have to produce the extra distribution)
regards,
Tom
ps: I really appreciate your product and effort. I worked many years introducing and maintaining DMS and quit consulting because of the amateurish behaviour of many dms software producers. Alfresco (already) surpassed some of them.
i saw that you put the source of core, repository etc as archives in the SDK. So the source seems to be there! What lacks are the (importable) eclipse projects, and i am not sure if or how they can be reconstructed..
What about putting the eclipse projects in the SDK too? Then we could use the availabe jars or change them, just as needed (and you don't have to produce the extra distribution)
regards,
Tom
ps: I really appreciate your product and effort. I worked many years introducing and maintaining DMS and quit consulting because of the amateurish behaviour of many dms software producers. Alfresco (already) surpassed some of them.
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎07-26-2006 11:56 AM
Hi paulhh,
Are you planning to upload the alfresco 1.3.0 src zip on sourceforge anytime soon? Looking forward to download it.
———————
Thanks, Manmeet
Are you planning to upload the alfresco 1.3.0 src zip on sourceforge anytime soon? Looking forward to download it.
———————
Thanks, Manmeet

Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎07-27-2006 05:52 AM
Hi
From a quick look at things, there's the source in the SDK and the Eclipse project files that can be pulled from SVN should work. So I'm not in a hurry to do more work while we're trying to get the 1.4 functionality done - we've bitten off a lot of work as usual 🙂
Cheers
Paul.
From a quick look at things, there's the source in the SDK and the Eclipse project files that can be pulled from SVN should work. So I'm not in a hurry to do more work while we're trying to get the 1.4 functionality done - we've bitten off a lot of work as usual 🙂
Cheers
Paul.
