- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-18-2016 10:46 AM
We have been hosting Nuxeo repositories in AWS successfully for quite some time with the S3 binaries manager Marketplace package. Now the AWS Elastic File System is out of beta, which lets us mount volumes in a "shared" manner, like a conventional data center storage deployment.
My question is: which approach should we favor for Nuxeo binaries storage? Should we continue to use the S3 plugin or should we use an Elastic File System mount? Are there any tradeoffs or considerations specific to Nuxeo's implementation that we should be aware of?
Thanks.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-25-2016 09:02 AM
Storing binaries in S3 allows binaries to be downloaded directly from S3, see the "Download From S3 Options" paragraph of https://doc.nuxeo.com/display/NXDOC/Amazon+S3+Online+Storage. It also allows you to have various encryption options.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-25-2016 09:02 AM
Storing binaries in S3 allows binaries to be downloaded directly from S3, see the "Download From S3 Options" paragraph of https://doc.nuxeo.com/display/NXDOC/Amazon+S3+Online+Storage. It also allows you to have various encryption options.
