11-22-2006 04:50 AM
Winsock rx2 len=49
10:24:32,210 ERROR [alfresco.smb.protocol] Closing session due to exception
org.alfresco.filesys.netbios.win32.WinsockNetBIOSException: null - Message too long
at org.alfresco.filesys.smb.server.win32.WinsockNetBIOSPacketHandler.readPacket(WinsockNetBIOSPacketHandler.java:138)
at org.alfresco.filesys.smb.server.SMBSrvSession.runSMBSrvSession.java:1511)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)
11-22-2006 05:16 AM
11-22-2006 06:29 AM
12-06-2006 08:38 AM
12-06-2006 09:24 PM
When I try to copy a set of files (49 docs, 15 Mo) through CIFS, Alfresco closes the port and raises the following exception:Winsock rx2 len=49
10:24:32,210 ERROR [alfresco.smb.protocol] Closing session due to exception
org.alfresco.filesys.netbios.win32.WinsockNetBIOSException: null - Message too long
at org.alfresco.filesys.smb.server.win32.WinsockNetBIOSPacketHandler.readPacket(WinsockNetBIOSPacketHandler.java:138)
at org.alfresco.filesys.smb.server.SMBSrvSession.runSMBSrvSession.java:1511)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)
Only 20% of the files are processed before the problem occurs.
I operate that copy from a Window OS to an Alfresco 1.4 repository.
Are there some limitations in the CIFS usage ?
Thanks.
12-07-2006 06:09 AM
12-07-2006 05:39 PM
In that example, I've picked up 49 docs from a local filesystem and dropped them in a CIFS directory bound to my client files explorer.
And "only 20% of the files were processed".
Neither 49 nor 20% are magic numbers.
Sometimes, Alfresco may copy up to 30%, maybe 40% of the files.
But other times, the repo can't climb further than 15%.
And I can see no huge (or corrupted or evil) file hidden among the others.
Let's sum up: opposite to FTP, CIFS seems not to be able to stand the load.
Can users rely on CIFS ?
01-15-2007 05:12 AM
01-17-2007 06:15 AM
01-22-2007 08:07 AM
Tags
Find what you came for
We want to make your experience in Hyland Connect as valuable as possible, so we put together some helpful links.