cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Alfresco Community 3.0 Dev Edition

useeliger
Champ in-the-making
Champ in-the-making
Hi,

I just downloaded and installed (from nightly builds) the 3.0 Dev edition - but I am disappointed. I thought version 3.0 will get the new user interface which was presented for example in Barcelona some month ago.

They also spoke about some nice new features - like multi-select - I can't find them.
33 REPLIES 33

mikeh
Star Contributor
Star Contributor
"Sharepoint is collaboration (and don't get me wrong, collaboration is great). Collaboration is working on document for a short period and intensive together. Document management is working together but less intensive, but it's for a longer period (that's why you for example use a tree structure to keep you're documents. You can find the more quickly)"

It's no bullet list but it's the most important argument for me.

Klaas
Hi

Personally, I'm still not clear as to the feature set you're looking for. You mentioned "tree structure" which is in both the JSF client and the Document Library within the Share client - but presumably you've got a more comprehensive list than that?

The out-of-the-box Share client allows you to create a site consisting solely of a Document Library. We think that features like tagging and custom filters (queries) make finding documents more intuitive than just a "normal search".

If you do have a specific set of requirements, please describe them here or as feature requests in JIRA which would help greatly!

Thanks,
Mike

mabayona
Champ on-the-rise
Champ on-the-rise
OK. I bite the bullet(s) Smiley Wink.

SInce Alfresco has all its paying clients using JSF based client, there is no risk of "being abandoned" as some people seems to be afraid of. Therefore, I think that what is needed is feedback from the community to help in the migration/transition to new features. My impression is that Alfresco has no other chance that providing a migration path and, probably the "market pressure" will be to "extend 2.X"  rather that jump directly into "something new and untested". So, no problem as far as 2.X interface future is concerned.

OK. Stop with "strategy" and back to "bullets"….

a) Support for "smart spaces": one of the strong points of Alfresco is its ease of customization of spaces by means of actions, rules, ftl templates and workflows (simple and advanced). I think that these facilities should be made available in the new 3.0 interface.

b) BPM Support: 2.x has out-of-the-box UI support for Advanced Workflows. Many companies use this facility for supporting its internal BPs. Similar functionality should be made available (as part of a site standard set of options? -as per wikis, blogs, …- i.e. task management?, to-do lists? pending task?). There are some feature requests asking for extension in current 2.x UI BPM support for 2.X that could be a interesting hint on what users want this functionality for.

c) Easy integration between JSF and FTL/HTML: now this is not possible out-of the box (although there is some contributed code that allows it). This does not allow a seamless integration of UI components. Now developers have to choose between JSF/Java or JS/freemarker/HTML. A little bit of 2.x JSF extension in this direction would be of help.

d) Support for "Reporting facilities". This s a new area (i.e. not yet covered in 2.X) that EVERY Alfresco installation need and provides somehow using custom freemarker reports. Some kind of standard reporting API would be of help for everyone. Maybe an approach as the provided by "Open Reports" (oreports.com) would be VERY useful since it has an eclectic approach that allows integration of Jasper Reports, Pentaho and BIRT. There is an interesting project in the forge that being very promising, has not really generated a finished option. In 3.0 lingo, what we need is a "dedicated" reporting "site" that provides access to the new "reporting API".

That´s it for now.

xerox
Champ in-the-making
Champ in-the-making
Alfresco,

Maybe we could merge this discussion with http://forums.alfresco.com/en/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=13488.
Or only post here new replies?
Because I think boths topics are the same…

Friendly regards,

Nick

klaas
Champ in-the-making
Champ in-the-making
Personally, I'm still not clear as to the feature set you're looking for. You mentioned "tree structure" which is in both the JSF client and the Document Library within the Share client - but presumably you've got a more comprehensive list than that?

The document library is not the same as a tree structure. The Document Library is only focused on one project (site) and the tree structure is focused on the whole organisation (well in my Alfresco repository anyway). (you also can't use a site for one organisation and make subsites for different projects (not that I would do that but just to show that Share is focused on one project per site and the webclient can be used for an organisation)

I'm happy to see that in the preview release the sites are visible in the webclient! That's great news (it would be nice if the documents of the webclient are visible for Share users. That they can select from the Document Library the documents from the webclient. I think this isn't available now.)

And of course the tree structure is not the only thing I need. I need features that you find in the webclient, like mabayona said.

The out-of-the-box Share client allows you to create a site consisting solely of a Document Library. We think that features like tagging and custom filters (queries) make finding documents more intuitive than just a "normal search".

Possibly if the user bother to tag there documents

If you do have a specific set of requirements, please describe them here or as feature requests in JIRA which would help greatly!

Ok I will

Klaas