cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

act_ge_bytearray size

luisalves00
Champ in-the-making
Champ in-the-making
Hello,

the table act_ge_bytearray is getting to large.

which is the problem?

* <property name="history" value="audit" />
..or
* I'm passing large objects (that are serialized to the DB) into the workflows (I'm using jpa).

best regards
5 REPLIES 5

ronald_van_kuij
Champ on-the-rise
Champ on-the-rise
what about the combination? Since either can be 'fixed' to solve the problem

luisalves00
Champ in-the-making
Champ in-the-making
uhm….after inspecting the table I found out that it stores all the deployed versions of my workflows (xml and png).
So the problem isn't related with object serialization or history level.

tks anyway.

pkuehn
Champ in-the-making
Champ in-the-making
Hi,

In our application we use activiti 5.11 and postgres as db and we have the same problem that the table act_ge_bytearray gets really large (about 500 - 600 MB).
This happens when we start our test, which starts sequentially about 100 processes. Each process has about 5 - 7 MB of data.

Increasing the number of running processes results the size of database larger than 1 TB, which cause that the partition is running full.

Any advice would be helpful.

best regards,
Paul

martin_grofcik
Confirmed Champ
Confirmed Champ
Hi Paul,

I read really good article from Tiese.
http://bitly.nl/redirect/&url=GpLFcd

Regards
Martin

jbarrez
Star Contributor
Star Contributor
What do you store? Only the process xml and png?

Or as Martin indicates, do you serialize a lot of process variables which are not primitives?