First, lets be clear about one thing; The long awaited 4.2 Enterprise will be an awesome release. I've only had the opportunity to run 4.2.e Community, but is so far the best version I've worked with. I'm sure Enterprise will be just as good, with all the added Enterprise benefits.
Now for the "Supported Platforms" document. It does have an unclear purpose. Is it to say that if you run the stated version with some component that are not ticked off you will not get support? Or is it to say use at your own riskt when not ticked? Something else?
What happened here is that after 4.2 being announced about a year ago and finally released, this document communicates that you cannot really use 4.2. This since there are so few ticked boxes that it is virtually impossible to use without hitting one of those non ticked off components. Do enterprise customers have to wait another 2 months before 4.2 is actually available (read usable)?
So this document can improve in many ways.
* Clarify its intended use
* Publish as a web page where you can drill down to version and components. The 18 page long document is very hard to get an overview of the components. Or at least make it shorter, different font and layout you can get it down to half the size.
* Make it less static. I can see that QA didn't get enough time to test all stacks before release, but once they catch up, update the document with new info. That is, do not wait for next alfresco release (if not needed due to bug) before ticking off support
* Every box shall have info. Now it is ticked or not. It should have different levels, something like: Fully Supported, Limited testing only, Tested but with known issue, Supported in future release, No longer supported.
Those "levels" are just examples, but communicates what is going on. For now, your customers are left not knowing when and if they will be able to use it with their preferred stack.
In its current state this document is more confusing than helpful. When you look at the supported components it says that you have released an unfinished product. I am however sure that this is not the case.
Hope this have been constructive feedback.
Cheers, Peter