- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎05-19-2015 03:55 AM
Is there a way to to get the InputStream of a file without using FileBlob getStream() method? I ask this because when I when I use fileblob getStream() it seems that it copy first the file in a temp file then return a blob. I this will affect the performance of my download because it will download first the file from nuxeo before it response as a file to the client.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎05-26-2015 11:06 AM
The Automation Client FileBlob
is always backed by a temporary file at the moment, even before you call getStream
.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎05-19-2015 08:24 AM
What version of Nuxeo are you using?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎05-19-2015 08:26 AM
Also, which FileBlob are you talking about? The one from Automation Client (if you're using Automation Client), or the one internal to Nuxeo (if you're extending it through its native APIs).
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎05-26-2015 09:07 AM
I'm using version 7.2. And the FileBlob that I was talking about is from Automation Client
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎05-26-2015 11:06 AM
The Automation Client FileBlob
is always backed by a temporary file at the moment, even before you call getStream
.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎05-27-2015 02:45 AM
Ok so there is no way to get the file without storing it in a temp file first. Thanks for this
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎05-28-2015 09:59 AM
Without re-coding part of the Automation Client (which is just a REST API client really), no.
