11-12-2007 01:31 PM
02-05-2008 08:40 AM
02-05-2008 02:25 PM
02-05-2008 07:08 PM
02-06-2008 09:05 AM
Mainly, I would suspect, because it doesn't speak URL, which means that,
although it's rather popular, it doesn't really construct Web
Applications: rather, applications which happen to run in a Web
browser.
For example, bookmarking ranges from difficult to impossible, and using
your 'Back' button may have completely unpredictable consequences.
REST? Only if you do it all yourself. Accessibility? With MyFaces, impossible. You get the idea…
02-07-2008 09:55 AM
02-08-2008 07:42 AM
02-08-2008 07:50 AM
02-08-2008 09:10 AM
First of all I should say: I do not have a strong background in JSP/JSF. But after reading just a little bit about these two technologies, I got the impression that these are not "real" frameworks (as PHP is not a web application framework but just a core on which a framework builds). Tapestry gives us a little more.
02-08-2008 09:32 AM
Well, JSF is a web apps framework just like tapestry is. The advantage is that JSF is kind of mainstream and there are a lot of open source component libraries (try google richfaces or icefaces). Nevertheless, tapestry is also a good choice..
Tags
Find what you came for
We want to make your experience in Hyland Connect as valuable as possible, so we put together some helpful links.