Error end event does not end the subprocess

Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎07-25-2012 06:15 AM
Hi to all, in my process I've got a subprocess with an error end event that is handled by a error bundary event. The error is correctly handled, but after the end of the process that is reached immediatly after the handling of the error, the subprocess is not ended (some records stay in ACT_RU_EXECUTION).
It's that a correct behavior? if yes, how can I manage the end of the subprocess?
It's that a correct behavior? if yes, how can I manage the end of the subprocess?
Labels:
- Labels:
-
Archive
4 REPLIES 4
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎07-25-2012 06:57 AM
Does the boundary event say "cancel-activity"?

Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎07-25-2012 06:59 AM
Does the boundary event say "cancel-activity"?
it's set false
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎07-25-2012 08:59 AM
Than it makes sense the subprocess isn't cancelled… You declare the boundary-event NOT to cancel the activity (in your case, the subprocess).

Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎07-25-2012 09:04 AM
Than it makes sense the subprocess isn't cancelled… You declare the boundary-event NOT to cancel the activity (in your case, the subprocess).
Perfect, thanks for the clarification

Actually changing the parameter I get the desired behavior.
