cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Error end event does not end the subprocess

npasquetto
Champ in-the-making
Champ in-the-making
Hi to all, in my process I've got a subprocess with an error end event that is handled by a error bundary event. The error is correctly handled, but after the end of the process that is reached immediatly after the handling of the error, the subprocess is not ended (some records stay in ACT_RU_EXECUTION).

It's that a correct behavior? if yes, how can I manage the end of the subprocess?
4 REPLIES 4

frederikherema1
Star Contributor
Star Contributor
Does the boundary event say "cancel-activity"?

npasquetto
Champ in-the-making
Champ in-the-making
Does the boundary event say "cancel-activity"?

it's set false

frederikherema1
Star Contributor
Star Contributor
Than it makes sense the subprocess isn't cancelled… You declare the boundary-event NOT to cancel the activity (in your case, the subprocess).

npasquetto
Champ in-the-making
Champ in-the-making
Than it makes sense the subprocess isn't cancelled… You declare the boundary-event NOT to cancel the activity (in your case, the subprocess).

Perfect, thanks for the clarification  Smiley Wink

Actually changing the parameter I get the desired behavior.