All working but....

[adnuser]

I have installed alfresco 1.2 (community) on a linux RHEL 4.2 with tomcat 5.5.13 and JVM 1.5.0-6, all work.

now the problem, i have been installed the OOffice 2.0.1 US without JVM, the log tell me "i have been found the Uno connector -> your are connected",
but in the transformation menu i can't see any of the filetype supported by openoofice ?.

what wrong ?

vincent

[paulhh]

Hi Vincent

The list of transformation targets in the UI is actually configured, so you would need to update that:
http://wiki.alfresco.com/wiki/Web_Client_Configuration_Guide#Transformation_Mimetype

Make sure you do the update in the shared/classes/alfresco/extension/web-client-config-custom.xml
file so it is upgrade-proof.  The mimetype needs to be one that is registered, which the OpenOffice ones are (tomcat/webapps/alfresco/WEB-INF/classes/alfresco/mimetype).

What are you wanting to transform from and to?

Cheers
Paul.

[adnuser]

ok thanks ,
i add the starwriter 5.0  mimetypes in the <transformers>
i create a new rule to convert a .odt document (ooffice 2 writer ) to a staroffice .sdw file
alfresco accept the rule.

when i try to use it with drop a document in the space fresh configured the server complaint.
"Transaction didn't commit: Transaction has been rolled back because it has been marked as rollback-only
"

on the log i found:

WARN  [org.alfresco.repo.node.integrity.IntegrityChecker] Found 1 integrity violations:
Duplicate child associations are not allowed:
   Association: Association[ class=ClassDef [ name={http://www.alfresco.org/model/content/1.0}folder], name={http://www.alfresco.org/model/content/1.0}contains, target class={http://www.alfresco.org/model/system/1.0}base, source role=null, target role=null]
   Name: {http://www.alfresco.org/model/rule/1.0}rules
23:48:07,884 ERROR [org.alfresco.repo.action.ActionServiceImpl] An error was encountered whilst executing the action 'composite-action'.
org.springframework.transaction.UnexpectedRollbackException: Transaction has been rolled back because it has been marked as rollback-only
‍‍‍‍‍‍‍

thanks by advance.