Activiti or jBPM5

[mhdshahdoost]

hi

our company must select java WorkFlow engine for one of enterprise projects , we must select between jBPM 5 [or 3,4] and Activiti.

we need some good reason for our choice. i work with Activiti and like it. we need to your help for good reasons for pick activiti.

finally , in current time for enterprise project , which are you choose between jBPM5 or activiti ?

[mhw]

hi

our company must select java WorkFlow engine for one of enterprise projects , we must select between jBPM 5 [or 3,4] and Activiti.

we need some good reason for our choice. i work with Activiti and like it. we need to your help for good reasons for pick activiti.

finally , in current time for enterprise project , which are you choose between jBPM5 or activiti ?

Hi,

I am exactly in the same position. Coming from jBPM5 I am evaluation Activiti at the moment. My impression is that Activiti is:
1) more modular (do not have to use the drools)
2) less bugs
3) more help and active members in the community
4) less memory footprint (just an impression, will make tests, soon - anybody could say something about minimal requirements?)

regards,

Michael

[mhdshahdoost]

hi michael

can you say more thing about different between jBPM and activiti , for example i think coding with Activiti need to less coding
and jBPM more code…

[mhw]

hi michael

can you say more thing about different between jBPM and activiti , for example i think coding with Activiti need to less coding
and jBPM more code…

I would find it very interesting to read about some more things about the differences, too. Anybody?

You wrote "Activiti need to less coding". Can you please provide an example?

[mhdshahdoost]

for example in activiti , Configure Database for store data very easy and need only change one file , but on jBPM you must do more things for start database.