Problem with multi instance activiti time event in a subprocess

[avc]

I have a problem with the boundary time event. After x minutes the Subprocess must exit but at the moment the Instance still exist and the escalation instance exist. In the manual stands “Since a multi-instance is a regular activity, it is possible to define a boundary event on its boundary. In case of an interrupting boundary event, when the event is caught, all instances that are still active will be destroyed.”
I don’t find the Problem

    <subProcess id="subprocess1" name="Sub Process">
      <multiInstanceLoopCharacteristics isSequential="false">
                         <loopDataInputRef>antrag.vorgesertzteKuerzel</loopDataInputRef>
            <inputDataItem name="assignee"/>
      <completionCondition>${nrOfCompletedInstances &gt;= 1 }</completionCondition>
      </multiInstanceLoopCharacteristics>
      <userTask id="dringlichkeitpruefen" name="Dringlichkeit Prüfen" activiti:assignee=${assignee}>
        <extensionElements>
          <activiti:formProperty id="dringend" name="Dringend" type="boolean" variable="${antrag.dringend}" required="true"></activiti:formProperty>
          <activiti:formProperty id="startdat" name="Start Datum" type="date" expression="${antrag.startDat}" readable="false" writable="false"></activiti:formProperty>
          <activiti:formProperty id="endDat" name="End Datum" type="date" expression="${antrag.endDat}" readable="false" writable="false"></activiti:formProperty>
          <activiti:formProperty id="abgesprochen" name="Abgesprochen mit Projektleitern" type="boolean" expression="${antrag.abgesprochen}" readable="false" writable="false"></activiti:formProperty>
          <activiti:formProperty id="besondereSachen" name="Beondere Umstände" type="string" expression="${antrag.besondereSachen}" readable="false" writable="false"></activiti:formProperty>
          <activiti:formProperty id="art" name="Art" type="string" expression="${antrag.art}" readable="false" writable="false"></activiti:formProperty>
          <activiti:formProperty id="stunden" name="Genügend Studen vorhanden" type="boolean" expression="${antrag.stunden}" writable="false"></activiti:formProperty>
          <activiti:formProperty id="bereitschaft" name="Ist der Mitarbeiter in Bereischaft" type="boolean" expression="${antrag.breitschaft}" writable="false"></activiti:formProperty>
          <activiti:formProperty id="urlaub" name="Besitzt der Mitarbeiter genügend Urlaubstage" type="boolean" expression="${antrag.urlaub}" writable="false"></activiti:formProperty>
        </extensionElements>
      </userTask>
      <startEvent id="startevent3" name="Start"></startEvent>
      <endEvent id="endevent2" name="End"></endEvent>
      <sequenceFlow id="flow7" sourceRef="startevent3" targetRef="dringlichkeitpruefen"></sequenceFlow>
      <sequenceFlow id="flow8" sourceRef="dringlichkeitpruefen" targetRef="endevent2"></sequenceFlow>
    
       <boundaryEvent id="boundarytimer1" name="Timer" attachedToRef="subprocess1" cancelActivity="true">
      <timerEventDefinition>
        <timeDuration>PT1M</timeDuration>
      </timerEventDefinition>
    </boundaryEvent>
   </subProcess>

‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍

here a the Diagramm

https://www.dropbox.com/s/a17hy2gtvr3cxom/fehlerassyncrone.JPG

[frederikherema1]

On first sight, looks like the boundary-event is only closing a single instance of the multi-instance sub-process. Is it possible to create a simple unit-test for this, highlighting the failure. If it's indeed an issue, as a workaround, you can add an additional subprocess-scope around the MI-subprocess and put the bondary-event on the outer sub-process.

[avc]

The hot fix do not fix the problem. The boundary-event is only closing any instance of the multi-instance sub-process. The Event create a separate instance. How can I fix that

thx

[jbarrez]

Can you please provide a unit test that demonstrates this problem in the very simple case?
I'm sure we have some tests for events + multi instance, but it is always possible we have missed some cases.

[kristamcbride]

read the discussion but still not able to find the problem. If you guys have solved it please tell me also.Just for my knowledge.      onlinecasinospiele.cc