Multi-tenancy with WCM

[danilo_barone]

Good morning to all,
I'm testing Multi-tenancy on Alfresco LAB 3A.
This is my situation:
I have a "universal admin" called admin (pwd=admin)
I created 2 tenant (tenantdom1 and tenantdom2) so I have 2 "tenant admin" (admin@tenantdom1 and admin@tenantdom2)
If I log in as admin@tenantdom1 I don't find the space called "Web project" and i cannot create a Web Project using the wizard.
If I log in as admin (pwd=admin) I find the space called "Web project" and so i can create a web project.

So these are my questions:
Is this situation normal?
How can I create a web project in a single tenant?
If I create a web project logged as "universal admin" how can tenant users access this?
I read in the wiki page (http://wiki.alfresco.com/wiki/Multi-Tenancy#Not_Implemented) this:

Not Implemented

The following are not supported/implemented/tested in a multi-tenant environment.

Alfresco Share

CIFS

WCM / AVM

Portlets

Is this true? I cannot use multi-tenant on WCM?

Thanks to all.
I hope you reply soon.

Danilo

[danilo_barone]

The documentation on the wiki is correct. WCM uses a different repository implementation that is not currently multi-tenant capable.

Thank you very much for your reply.

Regards
Danilo

[pconnors]

Does anyone know when this is slated to become available?  Although I desperately need multi-tenancy, the fact that it doesn't support WCM makes it useless.  I would love to NOT have to setup a whole other machine to accomplish multiple instances of Alfresco… but I think that's going to become a necessity… If anyone has information, it would be greatly appreciated!

[uzi]

There are no plans as of right now to address WCM multi-tenancy for Alfresco 3.2.

Within engineering, we've discussed implementation around WCM multi-tenancy and have a plan on how to do it.  It simply hasn't been prioritized at the moment.  If we were to pursue this implementation, it would probably be toward the latter half of the year.

I'd like to hear more about what you're doing if you feel that we should bump up the priority on this.  We have to measure it against all of the other things that we're aiming at for 3.2 (which include things like bolstered records management capabilities, new forms services, improvements to Share, etc).

Michael