cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

More In queries through services

hybaken
Champ in-the-making
Champ in-the-making
Hello,

I see there is just one possibility to create query with IN with TaskQuery or HistoricTaskQuery and thats the .taskCandidateGroupIn(list)

However this candidates are only unassigned.

There would be really nice to make it more free and add more IN options.
Maybe .processVariableValueIn(varName, list) will be nice place where users can specify own variable.

(assigneeIn, …)


Thx for response, hope its not so bad idea for some new release.
3 REPLIES 3

jbarrez
Star Contributor
Star Contributor
I would agree there are a ton of stuff that could be added to the queries.
But to be frank, the quickest way to get them in, is through a pull request, as these things do not have a high priority currently for us.

hybaken
Champ in-the-making
Champ in-the-making
Hello,  where should I put this request.?

(Anyway I solved my problem already by extending historyInstanceTaskQuery and few more classes)

jbarrez
Star Contributor
Star Contributor
The request goes into jira. The pull request goes here: https://github.com/Activiti/Activiti/pulls