cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

terminate end event

nemesis1
Champ in-the-making
Champ in-the-making
Hi;

I designed a process as follows. But I have a problem to terminate process when one of the branch is completed. It should not wait for other branch. I guess there is no development plan for terminate end event. Is there any other solution for this problem.

Thanks.
6 REPLIES 6

ronald_van_kuij
Champ on-the-rise
Champ on-the-rise
Did you try adding an exclusive gateway and just have one end event? Other solution is to implement a service task that looks up the usertask and 'cancels' it (delete it?)

ronald_van_kuij
Champ on-the-rise
Champ on-the-rise
Did you try adding an exclusive gateway and just have one end event? Other solution is to implement a service task that looks up the usertask and 'cancels' it (delete it?)

mjacobi
Champ in-the-making
Champ in-the-making
*** EDIT ***
Just saw that it is already implemented (only plugin) but not documented
*** /EDIT ***

Hi Ronald,
the proposed solution (an exclusive gateway and just one end event) does not work. Two tokens are generated and each of them must be processed.
I'am also interested if there are development plans for the "Terminate End" event ?

Cheers

jbarrez
Star Contributor
Star Contributor
It is indeed implemented, but not yet tested enough for us to feel confident enough to add it to the user guide.

dancar
Champ in-the-making
Champ in-the-making
Wondering if there is any status change to "terminate end event".  Or perhaps details where it might not work so well.

jbarrez
Star Contributor
Star Contributor
No, nothing has changed in the meantime.

I have no idea where it not might work … it's just that we kinda want a certain level of tests before we deem it OK