<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Alternatives to fork process without leaving current task in Alfresco Forum</title>
    <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-forum/alternatives-to-fork-process-without-leaving-current-task/m-p/21931#M9623</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think that the question is: what are you trying to achieve? Which kind of use case are you trying to implement that you prefer not to abandon a task?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Understanding the business scenario will definitely help to propose alternative solutions.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2018 07:49:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>salaboy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-05-08T07:49:05Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Alternatives to fork process without leaving current task</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-forum/alternatives-to-fork-process-without-leaving-current-task/m-p/21928#M9620</link>
      <description>From a UserTask with more than one outgoing transition, I want to be able to tell the workflow engine to execute or follow one of those transitions without abandoning/completing the current UserTask. Later, I would join the flows using an InclusiveGateway.The way I could get this to work was introdu</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2018 15:44:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-forum/alternatives-to-fork-process-without-leaving-current-task/m-p/21928#M9620</guid>
      <dc:creator>ebetancu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-03T15:44:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Alternatives to fork process without leaving current task</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-forum/alternatives-to-fork-process-without-leaving-current-task/m-p/21929#M9621</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you share your process model?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can usually use the output of the task to decide in a gateway based on the output.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So abandoning a task is just setting a variable to demarcate that the task was abandonded, then you can use that to make the decision of what to do next.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2018 13:04:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-forum/alternatives-to-fork-process-without-leaving-current-task/m-p/21929#M9621</guid>
      <dc:creator>salaboy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-24T13:04:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Alternatives to fork process without leaving current task</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-forum/alternatives-to-fork-process-without-leaving-current-task/m-p/21930#M9622</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Mauricio,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My current process model is similar to "MyProcess1.bpmn".&amp;nbsp;With&amp;nbsp;this&amp;nbsp;process model I am able to execute&amp;nbsp;"servicetask1" as many times as needed without abandoning "usertask1" (due to the boundary event with &lt;SPAN style="font-family: 'courier new', courier, monospace;"&gt;@cancelActivity="false"&lt;/SPAN&gt;).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;According to&amp;nbsp;your&amp;nbsp;previous comment, I guess you may be suggesting something like "MyProcess2.bpmn", where a decision is&amp;nbsp;made&amp;nbsp;in&amp;nbsp;"exclusivegateway1" based on the variable "taskOutput". If so, I would rather stick with "MyProcess1.bpmn", as it does not force the workflow to abandon "&lt;SPAN&gt;usertask1&lt;/SPAN&gt;" in order to execute "&lt;SPAN&gt;servicetask1&lt;/SPAN&gt;".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there an alternative to "MyProcess1.bpmn" where users can&amp;nbsp;execute "&lt;SPAN&gt;servicetask1&lt;/SPAN&gt;" (from&amp;nbsp;"&lt;SPAN&gt;usertask1&lt;/SPAN&gt;") without using signals and without abandoning/re-entering to&amp;nbsp;"&lt;SPAN&gt;usertask1&lt;/SPAN&gt;"?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Esteban&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2018 03:51:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-forum/alternatives-to-fork-process-without-leaving-current-task/m-p/21930#M9622</guid>
      <dc:creator>ebetancu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-26T03:51:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Alternatives to fork process without leaving current task</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-forum/alternatives-to-fork-process-without-leaving-current-task/m-p/21931#M9623</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think that the question is: what are you trying to achieve? Which kind of use case are you trying to implement that you prefer not to abandon a task?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Understanding the business scenario will definitely help to propose alternative solutions.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2018 07:49:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-forum/alternatives-to-fork-process-without-leaving-current-task/m-p/21931#M9623</guid>
      <dc:creator>salaboy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-08T07:49:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Alternatives to fork process without leaving current task</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-forum/alternatives-to-fork-process-without-leaving-current-task/m-p/21932#M9624</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. When technicians are working on an X manufacturing process, each technician needs to be able to complete its "manufacturing step", so that/before the next manufacturing step can take place.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. While a technician is working on its manufacturing step, the technician may request "job evaluations" (zero or many).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. Job evaluations will occur in parallel to the manufacturing process (technicians should not stop/abandon their work, while the job evaluation is made).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4. Technicians do not need to wait for job evaluations to complete the&amp;nbsp;manufacturing step.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;5. All job evaluation requests need to be addressed before the manufacturing process is completed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2018 21:19:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-forum/alternatives-to-fork-process-without-leaving-current-task/m-p/21932#M9624</guid>
      <dc:creator>ebetancu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-08T21:19:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

