<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Best practice for reopening or cloning a completed workflow while keeping a link to the original in Alfresco Forum</title>
    <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-forum/best-practice-for-reopening-or-cloning-a-completed-workflow/m-p/492109#M40342</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I’m looking for a way to reopen a completed workflow in Alfresco, or at least create a new workflow based on a closed one while maintaining a link/relationship between them.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This would be useful for simple recurring tasks or situations where a process needs to be restarted with reference to its previous instance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Has anyone dealt with this requirement before? Is there a best practice for handling it? Should workflows be designed never to fully complete in such cases, or is there a way to “reopen” them at the database level (or via API) without breaking the integrity of the system?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any advice, patterns, or examples would be greatly appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2025 22:33:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>la</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-08-13T22:33:07Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Best practice for reopening or cloning a completed workflow while keeping a link to the original</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-forum/best-practice-for-reopening-or-cloning-a-completed-workflow/m-p/492109#M40342</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I’m looking for a way to reopen a completed workflow in Alfresco, or at least create a new workflow based on a closed one while maintaining a link/relationship between them.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This would be useful for simple recurring tasks or situations where a process needs to be restarted with reference to its previous instance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Has anyone dealt with this requirement before? Is there a best practice for handling it? Should workflows be designed never to fully complete in such cases, or is there a way to “reopen” them at the database level (or via API) without breaking the integrity of the system?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any advice, patterns, or examples would be greatly appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2025 22:33:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-forum/best-practice-for-reopening-or-cloning-a-completed-workflow/m-p/492109#M40342</guid>
      <dc:creator>la</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-08-13T22:33:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

