<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Solr MetadataTracker cause OOM in Alfresco Forum</title>
    <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-forum/solr-metadatatracker-cause-oom/m-p/91069#M27128</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Ok thanks. It seems that we're using groups in a way that alfresco doesn't support... I'll report this in a separate thread.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2020 11:11:14 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>vincent-kali</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-10-17T11:11:14Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Solr MetadataTracker cause OOM</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-forum/solr-metadatatracker-cause-oom/m-p/91065#M27124</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We're running alf5.2g CE / solr4 with less than 100K nodes in repo, and 12GB of java heap size, 16GB of system RAM.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since somes days, we noticed a huge memory consumption and OOM errors. We were not able to link this behaviour with any particular change on the system. After a memory dump/analyse, we have seen that SolrTrackingPool-alfresco-MetadataTracker threads and org.alfresco.repo.web.scripts.solr.NodesMetaDataGet$FreemarkerNodeMetaData webscripts are consuming 12GB of JVM !&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Indexes in solr looks OK, but the MetadataTracker seems to become crazy......&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Did somebody experienced similar problem ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your help,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Vincent&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2020 09:31:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-forum/solr-metadatatracker-cause-oom/m-p/91065#M27124</guid>
      <dc:creator>vincent-kali</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-13T09:31:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Solr MetadataTracker cause OOM</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-forum/solr-metadatatracker-cause-oom/m-p/91066#M27125</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I guess this is the same question / topic as &lt;A href="https://hub.alfresco.com/t5/alfresco-content-services-forum/alfresco-consuming-unreferenced-memory/m-p/302517#M21643" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://hub.alfresco.com/t5/alfresco-content-services-forum/alfresco-consuming-unreferenced-memory/m-p/302517#M21643&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2020 09:34:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-forum/solr-metadatatracker-cause-oom/m-p/91066#M27125</guid>
      <dc:creator>afaust</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-15T09:34:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Solr MetadataTracker cause OOM</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-forum/solr-metadatatracker-cause-oom/m-p/91067#M27126</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Not really, we faced a very high memory/cpu consumption during hours (we finally understood that a FIX command on solr indexes have been run). Looks like it rebuild the whole indexes. Is the FIX command on solr supposed to overload the alf tracker ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2020 14:09:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-forum/solr-metadatatracker-cause-oom/m-p/91067#M27126</guid>
      <dc:creator>vincent-kali</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-15T14:09:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Solr MetadataTracker cause OOM</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-forum/solr-metadatatracker-cause-oom/m-p/91068#M27127</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The FIX command is performed by MetadataTracker, so it has for sure impact in the overload of alf tracker.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2020 11:23:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-forum/solr-metadatatracker-cause-oom/m-p/91068#M27127</guid>
      <dc:creator>angelborroy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-16T11:23:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Solr MetadataTracker cause OOM</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-forum/solr-metadatatracker-cause-oom/m-p/91069#M27128</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Ok thanks. It seems that we're using groups in a way that alfresco doesn't support... I'll report this in a separate thread.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2020 11:11:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-forum/solr-metadatatracker-cause-oom/m-p/91069#M27128</guid>
      <dc:creator>vincent-kali</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-17T11:11:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

