topic Re: BPMN 2.0 convention for embedded subprocess in Alfresco Forum https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-forum/bpmn-2-0-convention-for-embedded-subprocess/m-p/25586#M11069 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>The way you did the loop back to "Examine formal requirements" from "Deficiency process formalities" is valid. However the way you have multiple incoming transitions into&nbsp;<SPAN>"Examine formal requirements" (not fully visible in attached diagram) can cause issues. It is best to merge them using some sort of gateway and have one incoming path into that task.</SPAN></P><P></P><P><SPAN>Ciju</SPAN></P></BODY></HTML> Wed, 05 Jul 2017 19:54:25 GMT cjose 2017-07-05T19:54:25Z BPMN 2.0 convention for embedded subprocess https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-forum/bpmn-2-0-convention-for-embedded-subprocess/m-p/25585#M11068 Question BPMN convetion. Please see the screenshot as follows:From the above screenshot - is it permissible to have a flow going backards to main process activity from Deficiency process formalities subprocess? Is it following the conventions of BPMN2.0? Tue, 04 Jul 2017 13:37:51 GMT https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-forum/bpmn-2-0-convention-for-embedded-subprocess/m-p/25585#M11068 ysagar 2017-07-04T13:37:51Z Re: BPMN 2.0 convention for embedded subprocess https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-forum/bpmn-2-0-convention-for-embedded-subprocess/m-p/25586#M11069 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>The way you did the loop back to "Examine formal requirements" from "Deficiency process formalities" is valid. However the way you have multiple incoming transitions into&nbsp;<SPAN>"Examine formal requirements" (not fully visible in attached diagram) can cause issues. It is best to merge them using some sort of gateway and have one incoming path into that task.</SPAN></P><P></P><P><SPAN>Ciju</SPAN></P></BODY></HTML> Wed, 05 Jul 2017 19:54:25 GMT https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-forum/bpmn-2-0-convention-for-embedded-subprocess/m-p/25586#M11069 cjose 2017-07-05T19:54:25Z