<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Issue -Approver not associated with workflow allowed in Alfresco Archive</title>
    <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/issue-approver-not-associated-with-workflow-allowed/m-p/141568#M99179</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks for that - it explains the behaviour.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I suspect that many Alfresco users won't even notice the behaviour - they would assume that they couldn't hijack a workflow so wouldn't even try.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Because I'm evaluating the product my role is to see what users can do that we would rather they didn't.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Because the hijacking isn't registered in the audit it does rather make the product vulnerable to the malicious or mischievous individual within a company.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Scenario - Jim has had a row with his boss, looks for a new job.&amp;nbsp; Just before Jim goes he looks at his&amp;nbsp; boss's active task list and "tidies up" her task list as a parting present.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; The audit trail looks as if the boss herself has performed all the actions.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Jim denies all knowledge of his actions - and in fact may be long gone before his boss realises that something is wrong.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Such behaviour need not be just that of disgruntled underlings - inter-departmental rivalries, managers competing for promotion etc etc.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I haven't yet checked to see if a guest user can hijack the process ( one seriously hopes not ).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 00:13:34 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jackiew</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-10-30T00:13:34Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Issue -Approver not associated with workflow allowed</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/issue-approver-not-associated-with-workflow-allowed/m-p/141565#M99176</link>
      <description>I'm experimenting with the enterprise version of alfresco as part of a proof of concept and I was quite surprised to find that users who have no relationship with a workflow are able to perform actions on that workflow with no immediatelyvisible evidence of their actions.Rather than raise this as an</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 23:05:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/issue-approver-not-associated-with-workflow-allowed/m-p/141565#M99176</guid>
      <dc:creator>jackiew</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-10-21T23:05:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Issue -Approver not associated with workflow allowed</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/issue-approver-not-associated-with-workflow-allowed/m-p/141566#M99177</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Using the standard audit template there is no evidence that anyone other than the expected reviewer and the task initiator have had anything to do with the document.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;i.e. there is no trace of the fact that the active task was approved and closed by another user entirely.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 06:28:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/issue-approver-not-associated-with-workflow-allowed/m-p/141566#M99177</guid>
      <dc:creator>jackiew</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-10-22T06:28:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Issue -Approver not associated with workflow allowed</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/issue-approver-not-associated-with-workflow-allowed/m-p/141567#M99178</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Maybe it has to do with this jBPM bug:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBPM-1022" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBPM-1022&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Any comment?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 09:32:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/issue-approver-not-associated-with-workflow-allowed/m-p/141567#M99178</guid>
      <dc:creator>mabayona</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-10-27T09:32:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Issue -Approver not associated with workflow allowed</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/issue-approver-not-associated-with-workflow-allowed/m-p/141568#M99179</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks for that - it explains the behaviour.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I suspect that many Alfresco users won't even notice the behaviour - they would assume that they couldn't hijack a workflow so wouldn't even try.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Because I'm evaluating the product my role is to see what users can do that we would rather they didn't.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Because the hijacking isn't registered in the audit it does rather make the product vulnerable to the malicious or mischievous individual within a company.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Scenario - Jim has had a row with his boss, looks for a new job.&amp;nbsp; Just before Jim goes he looks at his&amp;nbsp; boss's active task list and "tidies up" her task list as a parting present.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; The audit trail looks as if the boss herself has performed all the actions.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Jim denies all knowledge of his actions - and in fact may be long gone before his boss realises that something is wrong.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Such behaviour need not be just that of disgruntled underlings - inter-departmental rivalries, managers competing for promotion etc etc.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I haven't yet checked to see if a guest user can hijack the process ( one seriously hopes not ).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 00:13:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/issue-approver-not-associated-with-workflow-allowed/m-p/141568#M99179</guid>
      <dc:creator>jackiew</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-10-30T00:13:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

