<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Process failover in a cluster in Alfresco Archive</title>
    <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/process-failover-in-a-cluster/m-p/135880#M95347</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I'm also new to Activiti but, from what I could see from the code and DB access patterns, an engine instance does not keep any state information about particular instances. This means that if an instance goes down, another one should be able to handle a task completion without any problem, since all relevant state is in the shared DB.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 02:36:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>pmsevestre</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-06-07T02:36:46Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Process failover in a cluster</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/process-failover-in-a-cluster/m-p/135879#M95346</link>
      <description>Hijust joined recently, so please excuse me if this is a repeat - I have searched the forums for relevant information, but still don't have all the information I need.We are prototyping a BPM requirement using Activiti. The server is setup as a standalone system on tomcat, and we have a service wrap</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 12:17:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/process-failover-in-a-cluster/m-p/135879#M95346</guid>
      <dc:creator>zlalani</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-06-05T12:17:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Process failover in a cluster</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/process-failover-in-a-cluster/m-p/135880#M95347</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I'm also new to Activiti but, from what I could see from the code and DB access patterns, an engine instance does not keep any state information about particular instances. This means that if an instance goes down, another one should be able to handle a task completion without any problem, since all relevant state is in the shared DB.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 02:36:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/process-failover-in-a-cluster/m-p/135880#M95347</guid>
      <dc:creator>pmsevestre</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-06-07T02:36:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Process failover in a cluster</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/process-failover-in-a-cluster/m-p/135881#M95348</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;That's right what pmsevestre said. So if you add a load balancer for a number of Activiti instances you automatically get fail over.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Best regards,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 14:56:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/process-failover-in-a-cluster/m-p/135881#M95348</guid>
      <dc:creator>trademak</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-06-10T14:56:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

