topic Re: Using Activiti Bare bones Style in Alfresco Archive

Using Activiti Bare bones Style

largesnike — Wed, 06 Feb 2013 10:11:45 GMT

I would like to use Activiti for its workflow engine in a very light-weight manner.I would rather not run the entire environment on a Tomcat server, rather I would like to define theworkflows in xml, retaining these as source, define my workflow delegates, and have Maven 1. compile the code,2. build

Re: Using Activiti Bare bones Style

frederikherema1 — Wed, 06 Feb 2013 14:41:57 GMT

Not sure what you mean with "Most of the documentation seems to assume that I want to run the whole environment, including the UI
for publishing worflows etc."

I beg to differ. Look into our user guide, it contains much more documentation on non-UI use cases

http://activiti.org/userguide/index.html#N10157: this section shows you how to create a process-engine to use. Than, look at our javadocs to see what you can do with the services obtained from this process-engine. So it's as simple as including the activiti-engine dependency in your project and configuring and building the engine so you can use it.

Re: Using Activiti Bare bones Style

araghuraman — Thu, 07 Feb 2013 00:15:29 GMT

Agree with frederikheremans.

Activiti does not need Ui at all.

I use version 5.11 with Spring and the spring integration is wonderful.
I create startup beans in Spring (these are run when spring application context is loaded).
Within the startup beans, I use DeploymentService to deploy the xxx.bpmn20.xml.
(Or you can have a separate startup application that is only run to deploy/delete workflows)

How to generate xxx.bpmn20.xml :
I only use the Activit modeler, at an arms length to create the workflow diagram (xxx.bpmn, openable in Activiti diagram editor):
I then re-open this diagram in the Eclipse Xml editor and copy the contents of xxx.bpmn to the another file named xxx.bpmn20.xml.
This xxx.bpmn20.xml can then be used with DeploymentService to deploy the workflow.
The Bar file is totally unnecessary this way.

In case you want some sort of admin Ui to see whats going on the Activiti database, you can install Activit Explorer as a separate
web application on another (virtual) machine and change the database settings to point to the Activiti database used by your
application

Re: Using Activiti Bare bones Style

largesnike — Thu, 07 Feb 2013 02:09:54 GMT

Thanks for the replies guys, very helpful.

I guess one of the more specific questions I have is whether the ProcessEngine is its own servlet, or do I need to set up a servlet context behind it? I was trying to work out form the Activiti samples, what was providing the application context, so I can set the same thing up in Jetty.

Actually, what would be better is if Jetty is just another dependency in my pom, and I build the container around Activiti and deploy the whole thing server, container and all.

Does that make sense?

Re: Using Activiti Bare bones Style

frederikherema1 — Thu, 07 Feb 2013 09:33:56 GMT

There is no specific "servlet" for activiti itself. Only if you want to use the REST-services, you'll need the restlet-application servlet.