<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Activiti Behaviour in Some Situations in Alfresco Archive</title>
    <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/activiti-behaviour-in-some-situations/m-p/118803#M83795</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;1. You should try to play with event handlers on the boundary of the call activity or wrap the called process in an embedded subprocess with a boundary error event on. Altough it ight be tricky to get it right, because errors are handled by scope, and you have two clear different scopes here. It might be good to check out if you can solve your problem using a signal throw and catch on the boundary event.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;For compensation, you can design it yourself out of the boundary event. Activiti does support a compensation handler, but I don't know if you will be able to model it correctly in this case.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;2. In general, BPMN has the notion of events for this. An event is interrupting (can be non-interrupting too).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2012 08:44:55 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jbarrez</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-12-26T08:44:55Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Activiti Behaviour in Some Situations</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/activiti-behaviour-in-some-situations/m-p/118802#M83794</link>
      <description>Hi,I don't know whether it is right place to post this but I need some guidance about some points.1. I have 2 callactivities in parallel, let's say A and B. In each there are some various tasks(service, receive, user etc tasks). Because Activiti processes parallel executions in order, it may be poss</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 15:38:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/activiti-behaviour-in-some-situations/m-p/118802#M83794</guid>
      <dc:creator>gokceng1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-12-21T15:38:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Activiti Behaviour in Some Situations</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/activiti-behaviour-in-some-situations/m-p/118803#M83795</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;1. You should try to play with event handlers on the boundary of the call activity or wrap the called process in an embedded subprocess with a boundary error event on. Altough it ight be tricky to get it right, because errors are handled by scope, and you have two clear different scopes here. It might be good to check out if you can solve your problem using a signal throw and catch on the boundary event.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;For compensation, you can design it yourself out of the boundary event. Activiti does support a compensation handler, but I don't know if you will be able to model it correctly in this case.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;2. In general, BPMN has the notion of events for this. An event is interrupting (can be non-interrupting too).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2012 08:44:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/activiti-behaviour-in-some-situations/m-p/118803#M83795</guid>
      <dc:creator>jbarrez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-12-26T08:44:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

