<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic sync. Process and persistence overhead in Alfresco Archive</title>
    <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/sync-process-and-persistence-overhead/m-p/102157#M71051</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi community,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;As a newbie I want to implement a fully synchronous process with Activiti. My process contains a chain of service tasks and each task is connected to a JavaDelegate class. When a message arrives as a Java object, I put it in the process variables map and start the process. Each JavaDelegate class modifies the message and the last task saves the message in my business DB. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;What I want to know is, if the process variable (in my case a big object) is persisted after each service task in the activiti db? If so, it would be a real overhead for my process. Is such a process maybe the wrong use case for activiti?&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Regards,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Wahid&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 10:06:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>metalli93</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-03-13T10:06:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>sync. Process and persistence overhead</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/sync-process-and-persistence-overhead/m-p/102157#M71051</link>
      <description>Hi community,As a newbie I want to implement a fully synchronous process with Activiti. My process contains a chain of service tasks and each task is connected to a JavaDelegate class. When a message arrives as a Java object, I put it in the process variables map and start the process. Each JavaDele</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 10:06:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/sync-process-and-persistence-overhead/m-p/102157#M71051</guid>
      <dc:creator>metalli93</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-03-13T10:06:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: sync. Process and persistence overhead</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/sync-process-and-persistence-overhead/m-p/102158#M71052</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Yes it's persisted every time you change the object. But it's persisted as a blob, so it shouldn't be too much of a problem if the object isn't really big (like &amp;gt; 100kb or so).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Make sure the history level is not set to full, because then every change is also stored in the history tables.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Best regards,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:15:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/sync-process-and-persistence-overhead/m-p/102158#M71052</guid>
      <dc:creator>trademak</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-03-13T12:15:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

