<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Javadoc vs. Implementation beans in Alfresco Archive</title>
    <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/javadoc-vs-implementation-beans/m-p/99871#M69104</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Ronald is right. If you want to use the Activiti API, all you really need to have are the interface javadocs. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;If you want to go deeper into the implementation-details and extensions, check out the user guide. Or use the Activiti-sources, this contains all code and potential javadocs for impl-classes only. Please note that not all implementation-classes are properly javadocced, since they are "internal" as opposed to public API which we try to keep thoroughly documented.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 09:29:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>frederikherema1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-11-08T09:29:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Javadoc vs. Implementation beans</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/javadoc-vs-implementation-beans/m-p/99869#M69102</link>
      <description>Hello,I'm new to activity and is looking at the opportunity to use it for major application of BNP Paribas (evaluating informelly first).I have installed the demo. It runs fine. Now, i'm looking at integration hurdles given our current runtime environment and pre-requesites regarding integration con</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 14:09:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/javadoc-vs-implementation-beans/m-p/99869#M69102</guid>
      <dc:creator>frederic_dernba</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-11-06T14:09:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Javadoc vs. Implementation beans</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/javadoc-vs-implementation-beans/m-p/99870#M69103</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The interfaces are the 'api' and thus 'stable' implementation classes should only be used in exceptional circumstances.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 16:44:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/javadoc-vs-implementation-beans/m-p/99870#M69103</guid>
      <dc:creator>ronald_van_kuij</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-11-06T16:44:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Javadoc vs. Implementation beans</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/javadoc-vs-implementation-beans/m-p/99871#M69104</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Ronald is right. If you want to use the Activiti API, all you really need to have are the interface javadocs. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;If you want to go deeper into the implementation-details and extensions, check out the user guide. Or use the Activiti-sources, this contains all code and potential javadocs for impl-classes only. Please note that not all implementation-classes are properly javadocced, since they are "internal" as opposed to public API which we try to keep thoroughly documented.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 09:29:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/javadoc-vs-implementation-beans/m-p/99871#M69104</guid>
      <dc:creator>frederikherema1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-11-08T09:29:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

