<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Activiti 5.9 production ready? in Alfresco Archive</title>
    <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/activiti-5-9-production-ready/m-p/97576#M67178</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks for the response.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 22:36:40 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>rangoo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-10-02T22:36:40Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Activiti 5.9 production ready?</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/activiti-5-9-production-ready/m-p/97572#M67174</link>
      <description>We are evaluating BPM 2 product for our production system. We are looking at Activiti 5.9 as an alternative to jBPM 5.x. Not sure if Activiti 5.9 is production ready.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 17:39:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/activiti-5-9-production-ready/m-p/97572#M67174</guid>
      <dc:creator>rangoo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-10-02T17:39:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Activiti 5.9 production ready?</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/activiti-5-9-production-ready/m-p/97573#M67175</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE class="jive-quote"&gt;Not sure if Activiti 5.9 is production ready.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Care to elaborate why you think this?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 17:57:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/activiti-5-9-production-ready/m-p/97573#M67175</guid>
      <dc:creator>ronald_van_kuij</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-10-02T17:57:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Activiti 5.9 production ready?</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/activiti-5-9-production-ready/m-p/97574#M67176</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Well it is a question, not an opinion. Sorry if it sounded that way.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 18:05:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/activiti-5-9-production-ready/m-p/97574#M67176</guid>
      <dc:creator>rangoo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-10-02T18:05:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Activiti 5.9 production ready?</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/activiti-5-9-production-ready/m-p/97575#M67177</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Are you specifically looking at 5.9 or do you want the latest version (5.10).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;A short answer to your question is yes the Activiti Engine is production ready, it's used by quite a lot organizations in production already.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Best regards,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 20:29:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/activiti-5-9-production-ready/m-p/97575#M67177</guid>
      <dc:creator>trademak</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-10-02T20:29:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Activiti 5.9 production ready?</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/activiti-5-9-production-ready/m-p/97576#M67178</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks for the response.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 22:36:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/activiti-5-9-production-ready/m-p/97576#M67178</guid>
      <dc:creator>rangoo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-10-02T22:36:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Activiti 5.9 production ready?</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/activiti-5-9-production-ready/m-p/97577#M67179</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE class="jive-quote"&gt;Care to elaborate why you think this?&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;To add a little back ground. Some of our projects are using jBPM 5 and teams are not happy with it. Although Drools Engine is fine, they think jBPM is not matured enough for a production system(critical bugs &amp;amp; tools are the pains they mentioned). They adviced using a Commercial product. But I am exploring Acitiviti and I am liking it so far.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;In that context I wanted to hear from users about their production experience.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 16:53:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/activiti-5-9-production-ready/m-p/97577#M67179</guid>
      <dc:creator>rangoo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-10-03T16:53:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Activiti 5.9 production ready?</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/activiti-5-9-production-ready/m-p/97578#M67180</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;As an open source framework, we have a very hard time to 'know' which companies are using Activiti. Most companies don't bother to tell us, basically.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;If you are able to come, attend the Activiti day (&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://activiti.org/activiti-day.html" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;http://activiti.org/activiti-day.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;). There will be 4 slots with real companies with real Activiti use cases!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 06:48:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/activiti-5-9-production-ready/m-p/97578#M67180</guid>
      <dc:creator>jbarrez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-10-04T06:48:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Activiti 5.9 production ready?</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/activiti-5-9-production-ready/m-p/97579#M67181</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;If it's commercial support incl. QA etc. you seek, have a look at camunda fox: &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.camunda.com/fox" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;http://www.camunda.com/fox&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;It's based on Activiti, and there are already several companies using it in production, e.g. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.camunda.com/fox/product/references/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;http://www.camunda.com/fox/product/references/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;best regards&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Jakob&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 08:33:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/activiti-5-9-production-ready/m-p/97579#M67181</guid>
      <dc:creator>jakob_freund</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-10-05T08:33:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

