<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic XPDL - BPMN in Alfresco Archive</title>
    <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/xpdl-bpmn/m-p/15292#M6665</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;on the WfMC-Website (&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.wfmc.org/xpdl.html" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;http://www.wfmc.org/xpdl.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;) you can find the following statement: &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE class="jive-quote"&gt;XPDL is the Serialization Format for BPMN&lt;BR /&gt;BPMN is a visual process notation standard from the OMG, endorsed by WfMC, and broadly adopted across the industry. But the BPMN standard defines only the look of how the process definition is displayed on the screen. &lt;SPAN style="color:#FF0000;"&gt;How you store and interchange those process definitions is outside the scope of the standard, and this is where XPDL comes in&lt;/SPAN&gt;. XPDL provides a file format that supports every aspect of the BPMN process definition notation including graphical descriptions of the diagram, as well as executable properties used at run time.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I am confused. Is this (the red marked statement) still correct with BPMN2.0? Is XPDL the technical XML-representation used by BPMN? Or is this statement just obsolete and wrong?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks in advance!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;P J Knaup&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 10:25:55 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>pjknaup</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-03-29T10:25:55Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>XPDL - BPMN</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/xpdl-bpmn/m-p/15292#M6665</link>
      <description>Hi,on the WfMC-Website (http://www.wfmc.org/xpdl.html) you can find the following statement: XPDL is the Serialization Format for BPMNBPMN is a visual process notation standard from the OMG, endorsed by WfMC, and broadly adopted across the industry. But the BPMN standard defines only the look of how</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 10:25:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/xpdl-bpmn/m-p/15292#M6665</guid>
      <dc:creator>pjknaup</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-29T10:25:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: XPDL - BPMN</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/xpdl-bpmn/m-p/15293#M6666</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;This was probably true for versions BPMN &amp;lt; versions 2.0, but for BPMN 2.0, the file format is formalized in the spec.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 11:38:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/xpdl-bpmn/m-p/15293#M6666</guid>
      <dc:creator>jbarrez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-29T11:38:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

