<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Master-Master Replication in Alfresco Archive</title>
    <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/master-master-replication/m-p/13586#M5710</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hey Russ - what would you expect of Master-Master replication, and what from your experience should we pay particular attention to?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Cheers&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Paul.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 10:47:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>paulhh</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-02-07T10:47:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Master-Master Replication</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/master-master-replication/m-p/13585#M5709</link>
      <description>Master-Master ReplicationWhat can you guys tell me about this objective?&amp;nbsp; What is it really? How far are we?&amp;nbsp; When can be expected?What is the proposed topology? How about server affinity?In the short term is there a possibility of using Redhat clustering (server level) as a lowest common denominato</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2006 19:42:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/master-master-replication/m-p/13585#M5709</guid>
      <dc:creator>rdanner</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-01-24T19:42:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Master-Master Replication</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/master-master-replication/m-p/13586#M5710</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hey Russ - what would you expect of Master-Master replication, and what from your experience should we pay particular attention to?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Cheers&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Paul.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 10:47:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/master-master-replication/m-p/13586#M5710</guid>
      <dc:creator>paulhh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-02-07T10:47:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Master-Master Replication</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/master-master-replication/m-p/13587#M5711</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hello,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;What is your opinion on using instead of master to master replication high-available geographicly cluster filesystem for the system to enable high-available DMS system. Is it possible to configure Alfresco to run more instances and share for the binary attachements the high-available geographical filesystem. Is there some issue related to the locking of files when simultaneous access occures? Is there some issue related to the slow response when the geographical distance of the each site is not small (for example distance about 20km).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks for the answer. Michal&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 12:22:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/master-master-replication/m-p/13587#M5711</guid>
      <dc:creator>mikee_cz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-02-10T12:22:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

