<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Complicated document merge question in Alfresco Archive</title>
    <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/complicated-document-merge-question/m-p/83551#M56122</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;From your description, it sounds like you're talking&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;about including content from one place within another,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;not line-level merges between conflicting versions with&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;a common ancestor. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;There are two very common approaches for handling&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;inclusion:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; dynamic (e.g.: server side includes or JSP includes),&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;and static (e.g.: template-driven includes such as you can&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;achieve via&amp;nbsp; freemarker and/or xslt).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;If you go the static approach, then you'd just regenerate&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;your output as-needed.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; If you use SSIs, it's all done&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;automatically, live.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; The static approach is more scalable&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;if you've got a huge amount of traffic, but even large sites&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;use dynamic inclusion fairly often.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; I hope this helps,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp; -Jon&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 05:45:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jcox</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-07-23T05:45:31Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Complicated document merge question</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/complicated-document-merge-question/m-p/83550#M56121</link>
      <description>Hi all,I need the ability to generate documents on demand, merging in sub-documents like copyright, legal disclaimer, etc. We are trying to use Alfresco for workflow but need to find a tool that handles the merging for us. I think this will require creating a template document with references to ext</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 19:47:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/complicated-document-merge-question/m-p/83550#M56121</guid>
      <dc:creator>austinjim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-07-19T19:47:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Complicated document merge question</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/complicated-document-merge-question/m-p/83551#M56122</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;From your description, it sounds like you're talking&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;about including content from one place within another,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;not line-level merges between conflicting versions with&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;a common ancestor. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;There are two very common approaches for handling&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;inclusion:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; dynamic (e.g.: server side includes or JSP includes),&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;and static (e.g.: template-driven includes such as you can&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;achieve via&amp;nbsp; freemarker and/or xslt).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;If you go the static approach, then you'd just regenerate&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;your output as-needed.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; If you use SSIs, it's all done&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;automatically, live.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; The static approach is more scalable&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;if you've got a huge amount of traffic, but even large sites&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;use dynamic inclusion fairly often.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; I hope this helps,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp; -Jon&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 05:45:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/complicated-document-merge-question/m-p/83551#M56122</guid>
      <dc:creator>jcox</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-07-23T05:45:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

