<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: archive element in content model in Alfresco Archive</title>
    <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/archive-element-in-content-model/m-p/12299#M5037</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The archive flag when enabled means that nodes of the given type are placed into the recycle bin (archive store) when deleted.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Btw, we've built a benchmark project for measuring various scenarios against the JSR-170 API as well our own native repository api.&amp;nbsp; This can be found in SVN.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 21:13:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>davidc</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-07-24T21:13:32Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>archive element in content model</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/archive-element-in-content-model/m-p/12298#M5036</link>
      <description>HiCreating a content model at the moment to do some performance tests&amp;nbsp; - seems to compare favourably with Jackrabbit. (As an aside, the basic test is creating nodes with properties referencing already highly referenced nodes, something Jackrabbit does not handle well - IMHO a serious shortcoming).Lo</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 17:38:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/archive-element-in-content-model/m-p/12298#M5036</guid>
      <dc:creator>dbevacqua</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-07-24T17:38:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: archive element in content model</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/archive-element-in-content-model/m-p/12299#M5037</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The archive flag when enabled means that nodes of the given type are placed into the recycle bin (archive store) when deleted.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Btw, we've built a benchmark project for measuring various scenarios against the JSR-170 API as well our own native repository api.&amp;nbsp; This can be found in SVN.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 21:13:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/archive-element-in-content-model/m-p/12299#M5037</guid>
      <dc:creator>davidc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-07-24T21:13:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

