topic Process definition deployment mistakes in Alfresco Archive https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/process-definition-deployment-mistakes/m-p/63663#M39971 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><SPAN>Recently, I've noticed that our Activiti schema tables seems to be tracking multiple deployments of the same two process definitions that we've been running our tests on. I thought that only changes to the process definition would create a new deployment record? If that's the case, there appears to be more entries than there should be (since we haven't been making that many changes to the two test processes) and I'm afraid might be due to our process deployment code …</SPAN><BR /><BR /><SPAN>I am pretty sure we haven't quite figured out how to deploy our business processes correctly, and was hoping if someone can give us some hints. Right now we are running the following lines of code on our ProcessEngineServletContextListener class … which get run whenever our webapp container starts up or shuts down I think</SPAN><BR /><BR /><PRE class="language-none line-numbers"><CODE><BR />public class ProcessEnginesServletContextListener implements ServletContextListener {<BR /><BR />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;private static final String CONFIG_FILE = "activiti.cfg.xml";<BR />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<BR />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;@Override<BR />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;public void contextInitialized(ServletContextEvent arg0) {<BR />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;try {<BR />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;ProcessEngines.init();&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<BR />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;} catch(Exception ex) {<BR />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;throw new RuntimeException("Could not initialize process engine in context.", ex);<BR />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;}<BR />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<BR />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;try {<BR />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;//loads the appropriate workflow process. <BR />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;ProcessEngine &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;processEngine &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;= ProcessEngineConfiguration.createProcessEngineConfigurationFromResource(CONFIG_FILE).buildProcessEngine();<BR />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;RepositoryService &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;repositoryService &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;= processEngine.getRepositoryService();<BR />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;final String process01 = "com/bnp/application/wfe/diagrams/newhire.bpmn20.xml";<BR />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;final String process02 = "com/bnp/application/wfe/diagrams/extendstaff.bpmn20.xml";<BR />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;DeploymentBuilder &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;deploymentBuilder &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;= repositoryService.createDeployment();<BR />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;deploymentBuilder.addClasspathResource(process01);<BR />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;deploymentBuilder.addClasspathResource(process02);<BR />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Deployment&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;deployment &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;= deploymentBuilder.deploy();<BR />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<BR />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;} catch(Exception ex) {<BR />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;throw new RuntimeException("Could not load workflow process.", ex);<BR />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;}<BR />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;}<BR />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<BR />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;@Override<BR />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;public void contextDestroyed(ServletContextEvent arg0) {<BR />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;ProcessEngines.destroy();<BR />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;}<BR /><BR /><BR /><BR />}<BR /><SPAN class="line-numbers-rows"><SPAN>‍</SPAN><SPAN>‍</SPAN><SPAN>‍</SPAN><SPAN>‍</SPAN><SPAN>‍</SPAN><SPAN>‍</SPAN><SPAN>‍</SPAN><SPAN>‍</SPAN><SPAN>‍</SPAN><SPAN>‍</SPAN><SPAN>‍</SPAN><SPAN>‍</SPAN><SPAN>‍</SPAN><SPAN>‍</SPAN><SPAN>‍</SPAN><SPAN>‍</SPAN><SPAN>‍</SPAN><SPAN>‍</SPAN><SPAN>‍</SPAN><SPAN>‍</SPAN><SPAN>‍</SPAN><SPAN>‍</SPAN><SPAN>‍</SPAN><SPAN>‍</SPAN><SPAN>‍</SPAN><SPAN>‍</SPAN><SPAN>‍</SPAN><SPAN>‍</SPAN><SPAN>‍</SPAN><SPAN>‍</SPAN><SPAN>‍</SPAN><SPAN>‍</SPAN><SPAN>‍</SPAN><SPAN>‍</SPAN><SPAN>‍</SPAN><SPAN>‍</SPAN><SPAN>‍</SPAN><SPAN>‍</SPAN></SPAN></CODE></PRE><BR /><SPAN>Though I've read the User Guide's sections regarding the Activiti Probe and the Bar … I don't think I quite understand them. And I don't know if the previous code is just the wrong way to go about doing it.</SPAN></BODY></HTML> Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:49:18 GMT yangyang_qian 2011-06-13T15:49:18Z Process definition deployment mistakes https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/process-definition-deployment-mistakes/m-p/63663#M39971 Recently, I've noticed that our Activiti schema tables seems to be tracking multiple deployments of the same two process definitions that we've been running our tests on. I thought that only changes to the process definition would create a new deployment record? If that's the case, there appears to Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:49:18 GMT https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/process-definition-deployment-mistakes/m-p/63663#M39971 yangyang_qian 2011-06-13T15:49:18Z Re: Process definition deployment mistakes https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/process-definition-deployment-mistakes/m-p/63664#M39972 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><SPAN>er, found this topic when searching for "duplicate deployments"&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </SPAN><A href="http://forums.activiti.org/en/viewtopic.php?f=6&amp;t=1524&amp;hilit=multiple+deployments" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer">http://forums.activiti.org/en/viewtopic.php?f=6&amp;t=1524&amp;hilit=multiple+deployments</A><BR /><BR /><SPAN>does that mean I'll need to add&nbsp; </SPAN><CODE>.enableDuplicateFiltering()</CODE><SPAN>&nbsp; flag to the deployment builder?</SPAN></BODY></HTML> Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:37:36 GMT https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/process-definition-deployment-mistakes/m-p/63664#M39972 yangyang_qian 2011-06-13T16:37:36Z Re: Process definition deployment mistakes https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/process-definition-deployment-mistakes/m-p/63665#M39973 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><SPAN>yes, duplicate deployments should be ignored when this flag is up… So when your process and resources haven't changed, no new deploy will be done.</SPAN></BODY></HTML> Tue, 14 Jun 2011 07:31:36 GMT https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/process-definition-deployment-mistakes/m-p/63665#M39973 frederikherema1 2011-06-14T07:31:36Z