<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Did Alfresco 1.4 include any JCR improvements? in Alfresco Archive</title>
    <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/did-alfresco-1-4-include-any-jcr-improvements/m-p/57964#M35350</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;We are currently evaluating various JSR170 content repositories for a large publishing company that has stated they have a need to develop a highly scalable portlet application built upon JSR 170 api.&amp;nbsp; Of particular concern are search related scalability issues due to xPath's poor performance.&amp;nbsp; In previous threads I heard a mention that in the future Alfresco's implementation of the JCR might be reworked to leverage Lucene for better performance.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Has this happened?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;As it stands now it looks a lot like CRX may end up being the preferred option&lt;img id="smileysad" class="emoticon emoticon-smileysad" src="https://connect.hyland.com/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-sad.png" alt="Smiley Sad" title="Smiley Sad" /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 22:03:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>lfuller</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-11-29T22:03:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Did Alfresco 1.4 include any JCR improvements?</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/did-alfresco-1-4-include-any-jcr-improvements/m-p/57964#M35350</link>
      <description>We are currently evaluating various JSR170 content repositories for a large publishing company that has stated they have a need to develop a highly scalable portlet application built upon JSR 170 api.&amp;nbsp; Of particular concern are search related scalability issues due to xPath's poor performance.&amp;nbsp; In p</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 22:03:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/did-alfresco-1-4-include-any-jcr-improvements/m-p/57964#M35350</guid>
      <dc:creator>lfuller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-11-29T22:03:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Did Alfresco 1.4 include any JCR improvements?</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/did-alfresco-1-4-include-any-jcr-improvements/m-p/57965#M35351</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi Lennard&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;We have literally just found an improvement that can be made to our XPath implementation - so knowing what we're trying to beat would help us see whether we can meet the requirements.&amp;nbsp; We do plan to overhaul the query implementations, but this will take a few months and come after the next release (early next year).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;As this is a commercial opportunity, it may be best to take it offline from the public forums - &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-email-small" href="mailto:sales@alfresco.com" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;sales@alfresco.com&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; will get routed to someone who will help.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Cheers&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Paul.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 12:26:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/did-alfresco-1-4-include-any-jcr-improvements/m-p/57965#M35351</guid>
      <dc:creator>paulhh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-11-30T12:26:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Did Alfresco 1.4 include any JCR improvements?</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/did-alfresco-1-4-include-any-jcr-improvements/m-p/57966#M35352</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Also, when we were benchmarking Alfresco, we did some ad hoc comparative tests with JackRabbit - and our XPath was noticeably faster.&amp;nbsp; The impression people have given us is that CRX is 95% JackRabbit.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Cheers&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Paul.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 10:54:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/did-alfresco-1-4-include-any-jcr-improvements/m-p/57966#M35352</guid>
      <dc:creator>paulhh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-12-14T10:54:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

