<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Identifying a chain of processes and subprocesses as a whole in Alfresco Archive</title>
    <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/identifying-a-chain-of-processes-and-subprocesses-as-a-whole/m-p/56729#M34355</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi all,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I'm using Activity to support the processes of a customer of mine. There are business functions composed by a lot of processes and subprocesses but Activiti does not seem to take into consideration this typical real world business case since it is focused on processes and looses every process-subprocess link. I see there is a BusinessKey attribute but it is lost when passing from a process to its subprocess. Am I right? Is it true that nothing links the chain (except for &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://forums.activiti.org/en/viewtopic.php?f=6&amp;amp;t=2053" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;/viewtopic.php?f=6&amp;amp;t=2053&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; campa improvement)?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Don't you think it would be useful to have something like a businesskey that is propagated at every level of process/subprocess chains. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;In my opinion, another very useful thing would be a progress number to determine the sequence of tasks visited during process flow. Two parallel tasks can have the same sequence number.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks a lot,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Massimo&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 13:46:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mlegnani</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-07-20T13:46:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Identifying a chain of processes and subprocesses as a whole</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/identifying-a-chain-of-processes-and-subprocesses-as-a-whole/m-p/56729#M34355</link>
      <description>Hi all,I'm using Activity to support the processes of a customer of mine. There are business functions composed by a lot of processes and subprocesses but Activiti does not seem to take into consideration this typical real world business case since it is focused on processes and looses every process</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 13:46:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/identifying-a-chain-of-processes-and-subprocesses-as-a-whole/m-p/56729#M34355</guid>
      <dc:creator>mlegnani</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-07-20T13:46:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Identifying a chain of processes and subprocesses as a whole</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/identifying-a-chain-of-processes-and-subprocesses-as-a-whole/m-p/56730#M34356</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;BPMN 2.0 does not really support this feature, so it will have to be an Activiti specific extension.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;However, what would be the value of passing a business key? Searchability? … ?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 07:44:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/identifying-a-chain-of-processes-and-subprocesses-as-a-whole/m-p/56730#M34356</guid>
      <dc:creator>jbarrez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-07-26T07:44:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

