<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Activiti on MS SQL 2005 in Alfresco Archive</title>
    <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/activiti-on-ms-sql-2005/m-p/46310#M25964</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hello. I would like to ask, whether there is a planned support for this database. Currently I can't run Activiti on it, because I can't create the schema. activiti.mssql.create.engine.sql and activiti.mssql.create.history.sql scripts will fail on MSSQL 2005, as in "create unique index ACT_UNIQ_RU_BUS_KEY on ACT_RU_EXECUTION (PROC_DEF_ID_, BUSINESS_KEY_) where BUSINESS_KEY_ is not null;" the "…where BUSINESS_KEY_ is not null" is not supported.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;How important is this unique index ? Could Activiti run without it ? I did not research the purpose of this table and index, but would I maybe be able to check that constraint programatically myself ? &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I really have no other option, that to use MSSQL 2005, which makes my heart bleed, because if I won't be able to get Activiti up&amp;amp;running, I'd probably have to switch to jBPM 4.4, cos of jBPM 5's poor Spring integration. Thanks for any help/advice.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 12:08:34 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>seges</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-06-01T12:08:34Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Activiti on MS SQL 2005</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/activiti-on-ms-sql-2005/m-p/46310#M25964</link>
      <description>Hello. I would like to ask, whether there is a planned support for this database. Currently I can't run Activiti on it, because I can't create the schema. activiti.mssql.create.engine.sql and activiti.mssql.create.history.sql scripts will fail on MSSQL 2005, as in "create unique index ACT_UNIQ_RU_BU</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 12:08:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/activiti-on-ms-sql-2005/m-p/46310#M25964</guid>
      <dc:creator>seges</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-01T12:08:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Activiti on MS SQL 2005</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/activiti-on-ms-sql-2005/m-p/46311#M25965</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The QA for MSSQL will be set up this month, so any issues with it, will come out. The index you are referring to is to ensure a business-key is unique throughout process-instances. If you do not use the business-key (it's an ID you optionally specify when starting a process instance, to identify the process with an ID that has a meaning for you) it's safe to remove the index…&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 08:07:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/activiti-on-ms-sql-2005/m-p/46311#M25965</guid>
      <dc:creator>frederikherema1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-06T08:07:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

