<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: multiple RM sites for a single alfresco repository  in Alfresco Archive</title>
    <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/multiple-rm-sites-for-a-single-alfresco-repository/m-p/304172#M257302</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;No the idea of an "RM site" has evolved.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; The model now (I understand)&amp;nbsp; is a single RM site for the whole organisation.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; There are unlikely to be that many records managers that they need multiple sites.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Different parts of an organisation have their own sites that can use RM functionality as they see fit.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Therefore there is no need for multiple RM sites.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2015 15:55:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mrogers</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-03-24T15:55:01Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>multiple RM sites for a single alfresco repository</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/multiple-rm-sites-for-a-single-alfresco-repository/m-p/304171#M257301</link>
      <description>Are we able to create multiple RM sites for a single alfresco repository instance?&amp;nbsp; It looks like this has been on the drawing board for years, but it doesn't appear to be implemented yet.If not, what's the best solution to handle different orgs wanting to have separate RM repositories?&amp;nbsp; Separate st</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2015 15:02:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/multiple-rm-sites-for-a-single-alfresco-repository/m-p/304171#M257301</guid>
      <dc:creator>dbiggins</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-24T15:02:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: multiple RM sites for a single alfresco repository</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/multiple-rm-sites-for-a-single-alfresco-repository/m-p/304172#M257302</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;No the idea of an "RM site" has evolved.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; The model now (I understand)&amp;nbsp; is a single RM site for the whole organisation.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; There are unlikely to be that many records managers that they need multiple sites.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Different parts of an organisation have their own sites that can use RM functionality as they see fit.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Therefore there is no need for multiple RM sites.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2015 15:55:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/multiple-rm-sites-for-a-single-alfresco-repository/m-p/304172#M257302</guid>
      <dc:creator>mrogers</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-24T15:55:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

