topic Re: CmisStorageException on cmis checkin in Alfresco Archive

CmisStorageException on cmis checkin

marcolf — Fri, 11 Nov 2016 15:39:01 GMT

Hi,i have a big problem with cmis checkin.I use Alfresco 5.0.d with Apache OpenCmis 1.0.0 (previous 0.13.0) and AtomPub implementation.My client side code isocument doc = null; Document pwc = null; ContentStream contentStream = null; try { // refresh object //document.refresh();// document checkou

Re: CmisStorageException on cmis checkin

jpotts — Mon, 21 Nov 2016 19:15:21 GMT

I am wary of using a version of OpenCMIS that is newer than what Alfresco ships with. In your case, 5.0.d ships with OpenCMIS 0.11.

Do you see this problem when using 0.11?

Also, can you post the source of your getContentStream method?

Re: CmisStorageException on cmis checkin

marcolf — Tue, 22 Nov 2016 08:44:57 GMT

Jeff Potts ha scritto:
I am wary of using a version of OpenCMIS that is newer than what Alfresco ships with. In your case, 5.0.d ships with OpenCMIS 0.11.

Do you see this problem when using 0.11?

Also, can you post the source of your getContentStream method?

Hi Jeff,

thank you for reply.

First I tried with OpenCMIS 0.13 with the same results. I will try with 0.11 and I'll let you know.

The source code of getContentStream method is:

    public static ContentStream getContentStream(Session session, String fileName, byte[] content) {

       // get mime-type
       String mimeType = MimeTypes.getMIMEType(fileName);

       // create content stream
       ByteArrayInputStream stream = new ByteArrayInputStream(content);
       ContentStream contentStream = session.getObjectFactory().createContentStream(fileName, content.length, mimeType, stream);
       return contentStream;

   }

I checked in debug and all parameters of session.getObjectFactory().createContentStream(...) are correctly filled.

If I insert a (little 500ms) waiting time between checkout and checkin the problem does not occur.

If I insert a loop that retry n times the checkin, the second time it works properly.

Thank you very much,

Marco.