<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Data object recombination and process instances in Alfresco Archive</title>
    <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/data-object-recombination-and-process-instances/m-p/43290#M23557</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi all,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;in our logistics domain there is a typical process modeling pattern dealing with rearrangements in the flow of data objects (or business objects, BOs) between activities: data from different process instances is processed by one user task implementation and hereby merged to FEWER results, i.e. not every process instance gets a result. Hereafter the opposite occurs: data is recombined into a non-fixed higher number of results.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;As an example, we have a coarse BPMN model A-&amp;gt;B-&amp;gt;C as shown below, where between these activities (e.g., a user task with complex internal BO rearrangement logic in its implementation, which may e.g. use a WMS (warehouse management system)) the following data objects flow:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;- Each incoming BO-A message starts a process instance and leads to a BO-A-object as a result of activity A (this is simple). &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;- But in activity B several BO-A-objects (e.g. na=5, but varying, originating from different process instances) are combined into nb&amp;lt;na BO-B-objects (e.g. 2, but varying). Only 2 process instances continue?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;- Finally these objects are processed by activity C, resulting in nc&amp;gt;nb BO-Cs (e.g. nc=4, but no fixed pattern). New process instances or threads are created?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Below is a variant of the model which uses only one process instance but data lists. Is the "Always receive messages of type BO-A" modelled right? &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Another alternative would be to use data repositories between the tasks to enable the free recombination of objects. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;How may such use cases be modeled and impemented best using BPMN 2.0 and especially Activiti (specifically, the control logic for the completion of such tasks)?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks for any advice&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; Norbert Weissenberg&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;[attachment=0]BPMN-Problem.jpg[/attachment]&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 11:29:34 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>weissenberg</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-12-09T11:29:34Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Data object recombination and process instances</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/data-object-recombination-and-process-instances/m-p/43290#M23557</link>
      <description>Hi all,in our logistics domain there is a typical process modeling pattern dealing with rearrangements in the flow of data objects (or business objects, BOs) between activities: data from different process instances is processed by one user task implementation and hereby merged to FEWER results, i.e</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 11:29:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/data-object-recombination-and-process-instances/m-p/43290#M23557</guid>
      <dc:creator>weissenberg</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-12-09T11:29:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Data object recombination and process instances</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/data-object-recombination-and-process-instances/m-p/43291#M23558</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;With Activiti data objects are typically implemented with Java, XML or JSON objects.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;So you don't model them explicitly in your BPMN 2.0 process definition, but you can use the Activiti API to start a new process instance with a specific object and retrieve those objects during process execution.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;So that's more flexible, but also less explicit.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Best regards,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 14:02:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/data-object-recombination-and-process-instances/m-p/43291#M23558</guid>
      <dc:creator>trademak</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-12-09T14:02:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

