<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Alfresco Common Criteria (CC) evaluation in Alfresco Archive</title>
    <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/alfresco-common-criteria-cc-evaluation/m-p/273384#M226514</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I'm not aware of any claimed evaluation level for alfresco or even if such a thing is possible or beneficial.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;However its certainly the case that many people review alfresco's security, and provide advice and fixes from time to time.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Its one of the advantage's of being open source.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Also alfresco is used by many organisations with very high security requirements for example government and defence.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 16:03:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mrogers</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-08-03T16:03:07Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Alfresco Common Criteria (CC) evaluation</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/alfresco-common-criteria-cc-evaluation/m-p/273383#M226513</link>
      <description>Hi,We would like to know more information about Alfresco in terms of Common Criteria (CC) evaluation in order to select Alfresco as a preferred choice for our project.Please read below paragraphs for CC and EAL.The Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation (abbreviated as Common</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 14:27:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/alfresco-common-criteria-cc-evaluation/m-p/273383#M226513</guid>
      <dc:creator>sanjaymodha</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-08-03T14:27:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Alfresco Common Criteria (CC) evaluation</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/alfresco-common-criteria-cc-evaluation/m-p/273384#M226514</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I'm not aware of any claimed evaluation level for alfresco or even if such a thing is possible or beneficial.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;However its certainly the case that many people review alfresco's security, and provide advice and fixes from time to time.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Its one of the advantage's of being open source.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Also alfresco is used by many organisations with very high security requirements for example government and defence.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 16:03:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/alfresco-common-criteria-cc-evaluation/m-p/273384#M226514</guid>
      <dc:creator>mrogers</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-08-03T16:03:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

