<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Lucene search for nodes that DO NOT have Versionable aspect in Alfresco Archive</title>
    <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/lucene-search-for-nodes-that-do-not-have-versionable-aspect/m-p/273076#M226206</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE class="jive-quote"&gt;Hi&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Try using alfrecso FTS and/or try &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;+PATH:"/Folder//*"&amp;nbsp; -ASPECT:"cm:versionable"&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;There a re some bug in the lucene query parser we hhok into for some queries.&lt;BR /&gt;Using + - explicitly usually gets by …&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Andy&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi Andy,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks for that, I'll give it a shot. Is using FTS any quicker over Lucene any chance?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Cheers,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Ben.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 08:20:34 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>bengrah</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-10-19T08:20:34Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Lucene search for nodes that DO NOT have Versionable aspect</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/lucene-search-for-nodes-that-do-not-have-versionable-aspect/m-p/273074#M226204</link>
      <description>Hi guys,Is it possible to run a Lucene search which returns a list of nodes which don't have the Versionable aspect applied?We have a rule which automatically versions documents being added, but it looks like this doesn't work when documents are added via a Windows 7 WebDAV drive. I've been trying t</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 10:26:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/lucene-search-for-nodes-that-do-not-have-versionable-aspect/m-p/273074#M226204</guid>
      <dc:creator>bengrah</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-10-17T10:26:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Lucene search for nodes that DO NOT have Versionable aspect</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/lucene-search-for-nodes-that-do-not-have-versionable-aspect/m-p/273075#M226205</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Try using alfrecso FTS and/or try &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;+PATH:"/Folder//*"&amp;nbsp; -ASPECT:"cm:versionable"&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;There a re some bug in the lucene query parser we hhok into for some queries.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Using + - explicitly usually gets by …&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Andy&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 13:55:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/lucene-search-for-nodes-that-do-not-have-versionable-aspect/m-p/273075#M226205</guid>
      <dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-10-17T13:55:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Lucene search for nodes that DO NOT have Versionable aspect</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/lucene-search-for-nodes-that-do-not-have-versionable-aspect/m-p/273076#M226206</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE class="jive-quote"&gt;Hi&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Try using alfrecso FTS and/or try &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;+PATH:"/Folder//*"&amp;nbsp; -ASPECT:"cm:versionable"&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;There a re some bug in the lucene query parser we hhok into for some queries.&lt;BR /&gt;Using + - explicitly usually gets by …&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Andy&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi Andy,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks for that, I'll give it a shot. Is using FTS any quicker over Lucene any chance?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Cheers,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Ben.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 08:20:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/lucene-search-for-nodes-that-do-not-have-versionable-aspect/m-p/273076#M226206</guid>
      <dc:creator>bengrah</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-10-19T08:20:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Lucene search for nodes that DO NOT have Versionable aspect</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/lucene-search-for-nodes-that-do-not-have-versionable-aspect/m-p/273077#M226207</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The lucene query parser and AFTS query parser both generate lucene queries.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;They will generate the same queries - AFTS generates more for you and allows macros etc - and is ours so easy to fix &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;As they do the same thing inteh end - the execution speed will be the same.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;If you use SOLR they are also cached in the same way.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Andy&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 09:19:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/lucene-search-for-nodes-that-do-not-have-versionable-aspect/m-p/273077#M226207</guid>
      <dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-10-19T09:19:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

