topic Re: 'couldn't signal without specifying a leaving transition' in Alfresco Archive

'couldn't signal without specifying a leaving transition'

darryl_staflund — Thu, 09 Dec 2010 19:45:36 GMT

Hi there,I have two process definitions, one of which is called as a sub-process by the other. The definitions are as follows:<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><process-definition xmlns="" name="audcmpmerwf:minorExamRevision"> <swimlane name="initiator" /> <swimlane n

Re: 'couldn't signal without specifying a leaving transition'

solo8788 — Thu, 09 Dec 2010 23:00:22 GMT

try adding to your process-state

<variable name="initiator" access="read"/>‍

if Thats not enough then replace the initiator swimlane in the subprocess:

<swimlane name="initiator" >
     <assignment class="org.alfresco.repo.workflow.jbpm.AlfrescoAssignment">
         <actor>#{initiator}</actor>
      </assignment>
   </swimlane>‍‍‍‍‍

Re: 'couldn't signal without specifying a leaving transition'

darryl_staflund — Sat, 11 Dec 2010 07:04:00 GMT

Thanks for the suggestion, solo. Didn't work, though 😞

Darryl

Re: 'couldn't signal without specifying a leaving transition'

solo8788 — Mon, 13 Dec 2010 18:59:20 GMT

I was able to use my workflow with sub-processes. The only other thing that comes to mind is that I had to update my workflowModel can you post yours please?

Re: 'couldn't signal without specifying a leaving transition'

darryl_staflund — Tue, 14 Dec 2010 19:12:58 GMT

Hi solo,

I needed to deliver my workflows to meet a deadline so both of them are merged at the present time. If I am presented with the opportunity to split them out once again and come across the same problem, I will list the models here.

Thanks,
Darryl