<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: history support: feature description in Alfresco Archive</title>
    <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/history-support-feature-description/m-p/41034#M21965</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi Christian,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I went through your wiki article. Thanks for the clear write-up, this surely helps the discussion!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;My remarks:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;* I like the fact that there is denormalization for faster queries.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;* I don't see the need for a reportService. As I see it, people will use a report technology (eg BIRT or Jasper) and go straight to the DB&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;* What's the use case for storing the activityInstanceId (not the id of the activityId) ? I don't see the need for it in reporting.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;*&amp;nbsp; Idea (not a remark): what about extending the Query API with methods such as .averageDuration() or stddevDuration() ? But i must say, thay besides it being "cool", I dont have a real use case for it next to demo purposes …&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;* Both tables store a processDefinitionId. But what happens when the process definition is removed ? Do we need to think about storing deployment history ?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 15:52:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jbarrez</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-07-29T15:52:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>history support: feature description</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/history-support-feature-description/m-p/41033#M21964</link>
      <description>I started a wiki page on the initial feature set of the history support for Activiti 5.0.http://docs.codehaus.org/display/ACT/History+SupportThe goal is to outline, discuss, and in the same time document, the scope of the history support in Activit 5.0.Your feedback/comments are welcome, either here</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 14:47:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/history-support-feature-description/m-p/41033#M21964</guid>
      <dc:creator>cstettler</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-29T14:47:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: history support: feature description</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/history-support-feature-description/m-p/41034#M21965</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi Christian,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I went through your wiki article. Thanks for the clear write-up, this surely helps the discussion!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;My remarks:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;* I like the fact that there is denormalization for faster queries.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;* I don't see the need for a reportService. As I see it, people will use a report technology (eg BIRT or Jasper) and go straight to the DB&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;* What's the use case for storing the activityInstanceId (not the id of the activityId) ? I don't see the need for it in reporting.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;*&amp;nbsp; Idea (not a remark): what about extending the Query API with methods such as .averageDuration() or stddevDuration() ? But i must say, thay besides it being "cool", I dont have a real use case for it next to demo purposes …&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;* Both tables store a processDefinitionId. But what happens when the process definition is removed ? Do we need to think about storing deployment history ?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 15:52:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/history-support-feature-description/m-p/41034#M21965</guid>
      <dc:creator>jbarrez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-29T15:52:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

