<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Advanced customizations UI;Explorer vs Share vs external app in Alfresco Archive</title>
    <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/advanced-customizations-ui-explorer-vs-share-vs-external-app/m-p/266163#M219293</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;To answer your question, yes alfresco is suitable for customisation. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;However you need to do some analysis to see which if any of the existing user interfaces suit.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; And just to complicate the picture even more &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":smiling_face_with_sunglasses:"&gt;😎&lt;/span&gt; a fourth option is to use one of the other user interfaces for Alfresco, your choice is wider than just Explorer or Share.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Edit :&amp;nbsp; You may like to look at this Blog entry from Jeff Potts. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2009/04/20/971" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2009/04/20/971&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 14:56:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mrogers</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-05-18T14:56:49Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Advanced customizations UI;Explorer vs Share vs external app</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/advanced-customizations-ui-explorer-vs-share-vs-external-app/m-p/266161#M219291</link>
      <description>Hope this is appropriate forum part for this post, because it&amp;nbsp; doesn't concern any particular part of Alfresco.We're currently investigating possibility of creating a mid-complicated web app. It involves a simple workflow (not 'simple' in terms of alfresco developemnt but rather not complicated). Th</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 11:34:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/advanced-customizations-ui-explorer-vs-share-vs-external-app/m-p/266161#M219291</guid>
      <dc:creator>michalwrobel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-05-18T11:34:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Advanced customizations UI;Explorer vs Share vs external app</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/advanced-customizations-ui-explorer-vs-share-vs-external-app/m-p/266162#M219292</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;in general it is easier to change something in Share, also it has much more customization options. Moreover, Alfresco Explorer will not be develop anymore. I think you should start to customize Share and get used to webscript API. If Share is not enough you can always change the user interface, not the API itself.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;smicyk&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 14:47:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/advanced-customizations-ui-explorer-vs-share-vs-external-app/m-p/266162#M219292</guid>
      <dc:creator>smicyk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-05-18T14:47:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Advanced customizations UI;Explorer vs Share vs external app</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/advanced-customizations-ui-explorer-vs-share-vs-external-app/m-p/266163#M219293</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;To answer your question, yes alfresco is suitable for customisation. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;However you need to do some analysis to see which if any of the existing user interfaces suit.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; And just to complicate the picture even more &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":smiling_face_with_sunglasses:"&gt;😎&lt;/span&gt; a fourth option is to use one of the other user interfaces for Alfresco, your choice is wider than just Explorer or Share.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Edit :&amp;nbsp; You may like to look at this Blog entry from Jeff Potts. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2009/04/20/971" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;http://ecmarchitect.com/archives/2009/04/20/971&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 14:56:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/advanced-customizations-ui-explorer-vs-share-vs-external-app/m-p/266163#M219293</guid>
      <dc:creator>mrogers</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-05-18T14:56:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

