<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Copyright exclusive ownership, is it possible? in Alfresco Archive</title>
    <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/copyright-exclusive-ownership-is-it-possible/m-p/259220#M212350</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Just a clarification: Alfresco Community is released under LGPL v3, not GPL.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Jeff&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 21:08:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jpotts</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-02-15T21:08:46Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Copyright exclusive ownership, is it possible?</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/copyright-exclusive-ownership-is-it-possible/m-p/259219#M212349</link>
      <description>According to the GPL License under which Alfresco is released, and supposing that an association uses Alfresco Community edition and customises it to comply with it's needs, can this association keep the copyright ownership of the resultant software in an exclusive way?</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 12:15:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/copyright-exclusive-ownership-is-it-possible/m-p/259219#M212349</guid>
      <dc:creator>yaziderman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-04-30T12:15:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Copyright exclusive ownership, is it possible?</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/copyright-exclusive-ownership-is-it-possible/m-p/259220#M212350</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Just a clarification: Alfresco Community is released under LGPL v3, not GPL.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Jeff&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 21:08:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/copyright-exclusive-ownership-is-it-possible/m-p/259220#M212350</guid>
      <dc:creator>jpotts</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-02-15T21:08:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Copyright exclusive ownership, is it possible?</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/copyright-exclusive-ownership-is-it-possible/m-p/259221#M212351</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi Yaziderman,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;GPL&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; and &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;LGPL &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Licenses conditions are different.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;You can learn more about LGPL;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl.html" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;http://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Lesser_General_Public_License" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Lesser_General_Public_License&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;SAMU&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 09:46:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/copyright-exclusive-ownership-is-it-possible/m-p/259221#M212351</guid>
      <dc:creator>samudaya</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-07-06T09:46:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

