<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Support of Aspects with OpenWorkdesk 3.2 in Alfresco Archive</title>
    <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/support-of-aspects-with-openworkdesk-3-2/m-p/255221#M208351</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;As you might know there're problems with aspects by using Alfresco. No other repository seems to have such a behavior with aspects but unfortunately Alfresco does not allow to use aspects as it is expected.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Alfresco knows about this and planned to solve this with Alfresco 4 but since this problem still persists in Alfresco 4.0.0c643 we expect or better “we are afraid” it will not be resolved in Alfresco 4.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; :!: But WeWebU today announced great news&amp;nbsp; :!: &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;WeWebU OpenWorkdesk 3.2 and Zero Install Desktop Integration (ZIDI) 3.2 will support Aspects for Alfresco 3.4 and Alfresco 4.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;OpenWorkdesk Version 3.2 will be available at 5th of March 2012 and will implement a stable support for retrieving Aspects from Alfresco.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:30:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mkappel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-01-26T13:30:01Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Support of Aspects with OpenWorkdesk 3.2</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/support-of-aspects-with-openworkdesk-3-2/m-p/255221#M208351</link>
      <description>As you might know there're problems with aspects by using Alfresco. No other repository seems to have such a behavior with aspects but unfortunately Alfresco does not allow to use aspects as it is expected.Alfresco knows about this and planned to solve this with Alfresco 4 but since this problem sti</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:30:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/support-of-aspects-with-openworkdesk-3-2/m-p/255221#M208351</guid>
      <dc:creator>mkappel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-01-26T13:30:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Support of Aspects with OpenWorkdesk 3.2</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/support-of-aspects-with-openworkdesk-3-2/m-p/255222#M208352</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Yes, but mostly it is currently a workaround for Alfresco-CMIS capabilities!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The support of Alfresco Aspect was integrated withe the REST-API of Alfresco and is not defined by CMIS 1.0. But the good thing is that the CMIS 1.1 draft contains a new ability called "Secondary ObjectTypes" which will lead to a better CMIS compliant solution.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 12:38:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/support-of-aspects-with-openworkdesk-3-2/m-p/255222#M208352</guid>
      <dc:creator>d_evil</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-03-19T12:38:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

