topic Re: Concurrent signals to same process instance. in Alfresco Archive https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/concurrent-signals-to-same-process-instance/m-p/235406#M188536 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><SPAN>I don't think there's an easy solution for this, except putting a queue in front of the receive task …</SPAN><BR /><SPAN>The thing is, on the lowest level, you've got two transactions trying to do the same thing, and one wins … leading to the optimistic locking exception … that's fundamental to Activiti and not easy to circumvent.</SPAN></BODY></HTML> Mon, 25 Jan 2016 09:11:51 GMT jbarrez 2016-01-25T09:11:51Z Concurrent signals to same process instance. https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/concurrent-signals-to-same-process-instance/m-p/235405#M188535 HiI have a process that makes heavy use of the camel integration within activiti. I have a process that waits on a receive task for a message to come in via Camel, does some processing on the event, then loops back around to the receive activity and waits for the next message. The activity after the Sat, 23 Jan 2016 14:00:42 GMT https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/concurrent-signals-to-same-process-instance/m-p/235405#M188535 mhanrahan 2016-01-23T14:00:42Z Re: Concurrent signals to same process instance. https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/concurrent-signals-to-same-process-instance/m-p/235406#M188536 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><SPAN>I don't think there's an easy solution for this, except putting a queue in front of the receive task …</SPAN><BR /><SPAN>The thing is, on the lowest level, you've got two transactions trying to do the same thing, and one wins … leading to the optimistic locking exception … that's fundamental to Activiti and not easy to circumvent.</SPAN></BODY></HTML> Mon, 25 Jan 2016 09:11:51 GMT https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/concurrent-signals-to-same-process-instance/m-p/235406#M188536 jbarrez 2016-01-25T09:11:51Z