topic Re: configuration refactoring towards spring beans xml in Alfresco Archive https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/configuration-refactoring-towards-spring-beans-xml/m-p/35507#M18648 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><SPAN>it's not going to be trivial refactoring the and synchronizing the spring beans xml for the standalone case, programmatic case and the spring case.</SPAN><BR /><BR /><SPAN>especially i think in order to simplify the spring bean xml, this could impact the ProcessEngineBuilder api.&nbsp; ideally i would like the api classes to be used in the spring bean configuration.&nbsp; </SPAN><BR /><BR /><SPAN>i think it's going to be too tight to try and squeeze these research and refactorings before ga release.</SPAN><BR /><BR /><SPAN>but we can get around it by moving the ProcessEngineBuilder to the internal impl apis.&nbsp; and promote ProcessEngines as the only way you can use the API now.</SPAN></BODY></HTML> Mon, 22 Nov 2010 14:41:38 GMT tombaeyens 2010-11-22T14:41:38Z configuration refactoring towards spring beans xml https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/configuration-refactoring-towards-spring-beans-xml/m-p/35506#M18647 Hi,Now you can use activiti with and without spring.&nbsp; And that is good.But we see a potential problem popping up.&nbsp; There are now 2 styles of configuration: activiti cfg xml and the spring configuration.&nbsp; Up to now there was good reason for this split up.&nbsp; As the things that we have configurable are Mon, 22 Nov 2010 10:12:57 GMT https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/configuration-refactoring-towards-spring-beans-xml/m-p/35506#M18647 tombaeyens 2010-11-22T10:12:57Z Re: configuration refactoring towards spring beans xml https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/configuration-refactoring-towards-spring-beans-xml/m-p/35507#M18648 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><SPAN>it's not going to be trivial refactoring the and synchronizing the spring beans xml for the standalone case, programmatic case and the spring case.</SPAN><BR /><BR /><SPAN>especially i think in order to simplify the spring bean xml, this could impact the ProcessEngineBuilder api.&nbsp; ideally i would like the api classes to be used in the spring bean configuration.&nbsp; </SPAN><BR /><BR /><SPAN>i think it's going to be too tight to try and squeeze these research and refactorings before ga release.</SPAN><BR /><BR /><SPAN>but we can get around it by moving the ProcessEngineBuilder to the internal impl apis.&nbsp; and promote ProcessEngines as the only way you can use the API now.</SPAN></BODY></HTML> Mon, 22 Nov 2010 14:41:38 GMT https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/configuration-refactoring-towards-spring-beans-xml/m-p/35507#M18648 tombaeyens 2010-11-22T14:41:38Z