<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Usage bestpractice alignment with business application in Alfresco Archive</title>
    <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/usage-bestpractice-alignment-with-business-application/m-p/232117#M185247</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi all, &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;we are thinking about the right way to use activiti for a new business application (quality management related).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Is there a best practice for aligning business objects with bpm tasks?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;For us there are two different ways to integrate the bpm engine in our app.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;1. Setting up an database for the business objects (like quality notification and their tasks), where a task is not really an workflow task in bpm. And in a second database / scheme, the activiti db which handles the process flow (only during the validity period of the quality notification (business object)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;2. Second way would be, to setting up the first db only for the "notification data" and put all the business related tasks data into the activiti db model.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;What is best practice? What is are the advantages and disadvantages of both solutions?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Are there any other possible solutions (out of your experience)?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks in advance&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Tom&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2016 15:04:34 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>toz</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-01-12T15:04:34Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Usage bestpractice alignment with business application</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/usage-bestpractice-alignment-with-business-application/m-p/232117#M185247</link>
      <description>Hi all, we are thinking about the right way to use activiti for a new business application (quality management related).Is there a best practice for aligning business objects with bpm tasks?For us there are two different ways to integrate the bpm engine in our app.1. Setting up an database for the b</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2016 15:04:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/usage-bestpractice-alignment-with-business-application/m-p/232117#M185247</guid>
      <dc:creator>toz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-12T15:04:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Usage bestpractice alignment with business application</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/usage-bestpractice-alignment-with-business-application/m-p/232118#M185248</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Imho, Activiti should not be used as a datastore, so point 1 would be my preference.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Activiti should only store references to other data stores, not maintain the 'master copy'.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2016 22:05:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/usage-bestpractice-alignment-with-business-application/m-p/232118#M185248</guid>
      <dc:creator>jbarrez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-20T22:05:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

