<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Bad performance due to sleep() in AcquireJobsCmd in Alfresco Archive</title>
    <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/bad-performance-due-to-sleep-in-acquirejobscmd/m-p/219925#M173055</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;nbsp; The question is, if you want to fix that for other projects&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;No, because that sleep was probably introduced for a reason and it'll break other things.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;We've created the Async Executor, which has proved to be far superior when it comes to performance. The old job executor will be deprecated in the future.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2016 09:13:43 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jbarrez</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-03-07T09:13:43Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Bad performance due to sleep() in AcquireJobsCmd</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/bad-performance-due-to-sleep-in-acquirejobscmd/m-p/219922#M173052</link>
      <description>The sleep(100) inhttps://github.com/Activiti/Activiti/blob/master/modules/activiti-engine/src/main/java/org/activiti/engine/impl/cmd/AcquireJobsCmd.java#L58caused a significant performance reduction. Should I create an issue?</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2016 12:11:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/bad-performance-due-to-sleep-in-acquirejobscmd/m-p/219922#M173052</guid>
      <dc:creator>keymaster</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-01T12:11:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Bad performance due to sleep() in AcquireJobsCmd</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/bad-performance-due-to-sleep-in-acquirejobscmd/m-p/219923#M173053</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Did you try the async executor? It does not have that sleep method and performs better (for various other reasons).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2016 21:21:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/bad-performance-due-to-sleep-in-acquirejobscmd/m-p/219923#M173053</guid>
      <dc:creator>jbarrez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-01T21:21:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Bad performance due to sleep() in AcquireJobsCmd</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/bad-performance-due-to-sleep-in-acquirejobscmd/m-p/219924#M173054</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;This currently is no option for our project, sorry. The Application is tested and staged for production. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;We removed that sleep. The question is, if you want to fix that for other projects. A sleep in that method smells like a bug or a race condition.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2016 06:44:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/bad-performance-due-to-sleep-in-acquirejobscmd/m-p/219924#M173054</guid>
      <dc:creator>keymaster</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-02T06:44:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Bad performance due to sleep() in AcquireJobsCmd</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/bad-performance-due-to-sleep-in-acquirejobscmd/m-p/219925#M173055</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;nbsp; The question is, if you want to fix that for other projects&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;No, because that sleep was probably introduced for a reason and it'll break other things.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;We've created the Async Executor, which has proved to be far superior when it comes to performance. The old job executor will be deprecated in the future.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2016 09:13:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/bad-performance-due-to-sleep-in-acquirejobscmd/m-p/219925#M173055</guid>
      <dc:creator>jbarrez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-07T09:13:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

