<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Process Instance migration in Alfresco Archive</title>
    <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/process-instance-migration/m-p/218345#M171475</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi Cyterdan,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The first option is more suitable for simulations. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I would vote for the option 2:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;OL style="list-style-type:decimal;"&gt;&lt;LI&gt;the history is kept&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;no additional effort is needed to get the process instance to the state.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Regards&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Martin&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2016 07:35:52 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>martin_grofcik</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-02-26T07:35:52Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Process Instance migration</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/process-instance-migration/m-p/218344#M171474</link>
      <description>Hi, We're currently running activiti for a business process (with no sub process or parallel execution). We're looking to deploy a new version of the process definition and gracefully migrate all the process instances to the new version.This has been discussed in the past but I'm wondering what is t</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 10:13:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/process-instance-migration/m-p/218344#M171474</guid>
      <dc:creator>cyterdan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-25T10:13:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Process Instance migration</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/process-instance-migration/m-p/218345#M171475</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi Cyterdan,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The first option is more suitable for simulations. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I would vote for the option 2:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;OL style="list-style-type:decimal;"&gt;&lt;LI&gt;the history is kept&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;no additional effort is needed to get the process instance to the state.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Regards&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Martin&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2016 07:35:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/process-instance-migration/m-p/218345#M171475</guid>
      <dc:creator>martin_grofcik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-26T07:35:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

